Back to Search Start Over

Assessing SOFA score trajectories in sepsis using machine learning: A pragmatic approach to improve the accuracy of mortality prediction.

Authors :
Lars Palmowski
Hartmuth Nowak
Andrea Witowski
Björn Koos
Alexander Wolf
Maike Weber
Daniel Kleefisch
Matthias Unterberg
Helge Haberl
Alexander von Busch
Christian Ertmer
Alexander Zarbock
Christian Bode
Christian Putensen
Ulrich Limper
Frank Wappler
Thomas Köhler
Dietrich Henzler
Daniel Oswald
Björn Ellger
Stefan F Ehrentraut
Lars Bergmann
Katharina Rump
Dominik Ziehe
Nina Babel
Barbara Sitek
Katrin Marcus
Ulrich H Frey
Patrick J Thoral
Michael Adamzik
Martin Eisenacher
Tim Rahmel
SepsisDataNet.NRW research group
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 19, Iss 3, p e0300739 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2024.

Abstract

IntroductionAn increasing amount of longitudinal health data is available on critically ill septic patients in the age of digital medicine, including daily sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score measurements. Thus, the assessment in sepsis focuses increasingly on the evaluation of the individual disease's trajectory. Machine learning (ML) algorithms may provide a promising approach here to improve the evaluation of daily SOFA score dynamics. We tested whether ML algorithms can outperform the conventional ΔSOFA score regarding the accuracy of 30-day mortality prediction.MethodsWe used the multicentric SepsisDataNet.NRW study cohort that prospectively enrolled 252 sepsis patients between 03/2018 and 09/2019 for training ML algorithms, i.e. support vector machine (SVM) with polynomial kernel and artificial neural network (aNN). We used the Amsterdam UMC database covering 1,790 sepsis patients for external and independent validation.ResultsBoth SVM (AUC 0.84; 95% CI: 0.71-0.96) and aNN (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.95) assessing the SOFA scores of the first seven days led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score between day 1 and 7 (AUC 0.73; 95% CI: 0.65-0.80; p = 0.02 and p = 0.05, respectively). These differences were even more prominent the shorter the time interval considered. Using the SOFA scores of day 1 to 3 SVM (AUC 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68 0.95) and aNN (AUC 0.80; 95% CI: 0.660.93) led to a more accurate prognosis of 30-day mortality compared to the ΔSOFA score (AUC 0.66; 95% CI: 0.58-0.74; p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Strikingly, all these findings could be confirmed in the independent external validation cohort.ConclusionsThe ML-based algorithms using daily SOFA scores markedly improved the accuracy of mortality compared to the conventional ΔSOFA score. Therefore, this approach could provide a promising and automated approach to assess the individual disease trajectory in sepsis. These findings reflect the potential of incorporating ML algorithms as robust and generalizable support tools on intensive care units.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
19
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.32a6a63257a74944a3f560686b8b35c2
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300739&type=printable