Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women

Authors :
Naoko Sasamoto
Ana Babic
Bernard A. Rosner
Renée T. Fortner
Allison F. Vitonis
Hidemi Yamamoto
Raina N. Fichorova
Linda J. Titus
Anne Tjønneland
Louise Hansen
Marina Kvaskoff
Agnès Fournier
Francesca Romana Mancini
Heiner Boeing
Antonia Trichopoulou
Eleni Peppa
Anna Karakatsani
Domenico Palli
Sara Grioni
Amalia Mattiello
Rosario Tumino
Valentina Fiano
N. Charlotte Onland-Moret
Elisabete Weiderpass
Inger T. Gram
J. Ramón Quirós
Leila Lujan-Barroso
Maria-Jose Sánchez
Sandra Colorado-Yohar
Aurelio Barricarte
Pilar Amiano
Annika Idahl
Eva Lundin
Hanna Sartor
Kay-Tee Khaw
Timothy J. Key
David Muller
Elio Riboli
Marc Gunter
Laure Dossus
Britton Trabert
Nicolas Wentzensen
Rudolf Kaaks
Daniel W. Cramer
Shelley S. Tworoger
Kathryn L. Terry
Source :
Journal of Ovarian Research, Vol 12, Iss 1, Pp 1-12 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMC, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer Antigen 125 (CA125) is currently the best available ovarian cancer screening biomarker. However, CA125 has been limited by low sensitivity and specificity in part due to normal variation between individuals. Personal characteristics that influence CA125 could be used to improve its performance as screening biomarker. Methods We developed and validated linear and dichotomous (≥35 U/mL) circulating CA125 prediction models in postmenopausal women without ovarian cancer who participated in one of five large population-based studies: Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO, n = 26,981), European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC, n = 861), the Nurses’ Health Studies (NHS/NHSII, n = 81), and the New England Case Control Study (NEC, n = 923). The prediction models were developed using stepwise regression in PLCO and validated in EPIC, NHS/NHSII and NEC. Result The linear CA125 prediction model, which included age, race, body mass index (BMI), smoking status and duration, parity, hysterectomy, age at menopause, and duration of hormone therapy (HT), explained 5% of the total variance of CA125. The correlation between measured and predicted CA125 was comparable in PLCO testing dataset (r = 0.18) and external validation datasets (r = 0.14). The dichotomous CA125 prediction model included age, race, BMI, smoking status and duration, hysterectomy, time since menopause, and duration of HT with AUC of 0.64 in PLCO and 0.80 in validation dataset. Conclusions The linear prediction model explained a small portion of the total variability of CA125, suggesting the need to identify novel predictors of CA125. The dichotomous prediction model showed moderate discriminatory performance which validated well in independent dataset. Our dichotomous model could be valuable in identifying healthy women who may have elevated CA125 levels, which may contribute to reducing false positive tests using CA125 as screening biomarker.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17572215
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Ovarian Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.31979de161694e43ac98261dd90413c9
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0591-4