Back to Search Start Over

Randomised controlled trial of intravenous nafamostat mesylate in COVID pneumonitis: Phase 1b/2a experimental study to investigate safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics

Authors :
Tom M. Quinn
Erin E. Gaughan
Annya Bruce
Jean Antonelli
Richard O'Connor
Feng Li
Sarah McNamara
Oliver Koch
Claire MacKintosh
David Dockrell
Timothy Walsh
Kevin G. Blyth
Colin Church
Jürgen Schwarze
Cecilia Boz
Asta Valanciute
Matthew Burgess
Philip Emanuel
Bethany Mills
Giulia Rinaldi
Gareth Hardisty
Ross Mills
Emily Gwyer Findlay
Sunny Jabbal
Andrew Duncan
Sinéad Plant
Adam D.L. Marshall
Irene Young
Kay Russell
Emma Scholefield
Alastair F. Nimmo
Islom B. Nazarov
Grant C. Churchill
James S.O. McCullagh
Kourosh H. Ebrahimi
Colin Ferrett
Kate Templeton
Steve Rannard
Andrew Owen
Anne Moore
Keith Finlayson
Manu Shankar-Hari
John Norrie
Richard A. Parker
Ahsan R. Akram
Daniel C. Anthony
James W. Dear
Nik Hirani
Kevin Dhaliwal
Source :
EBioMedicine, Vol 76, Iss , Pp 103856- (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2022.

Abstract

Summary: Background: Many repurposed drugs have progressed rapidly to Phase 2 and 3 trials in COVID19 without characterisation of Pharmacokinetics /Pharmacodynamics including safety data. One such drug is nafamostat mesylate. Methods: We present the findings of a phase Ib/IIa open label, platform randomised controlled trial of intravenous nafamostat in hospitalised patients with confirmed COVID-19 pneumonitis. Patients were assigned randomly to standard of care (SoC), nafamostat or an alternative therapy. Nafamostat was administered as an intravenous infusion at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/h for a maximum of seven days. The analysis population included those who received any dose of the trial drug and all patients randomised to SoC. The primary outcomes of our trial were the safety and tolerability of intravenous nafamostat as an add on therapy for patients hospitalised with COVID-19 pneumonitis. Findings: Data is reported from 42 patients, 21 of which were randomly assigned to receive intravenous nafamostat. 86% of nafamostat-treated patients experienced at least one AE compared to 57% of the SoC group. The nafamostat group were significantly more likely to experience at least one AE (posterior mean odds ratio 5.17, 95% credible interval (CI) 1.10 – 26.05) and developed significantly higher plasma creatinine levels (posterior mean difference 10.57 micromol/L, 95% CI 2.43–18.92). An average longer hospital stay was observed in nafamostat patients, alongside a lower rate of oxygen free days (rate ratio 0.55–95% CI 0.31–0.99, respectively). There were no other statistically significant differences in endpoints between nafamostat and SoC. PK data demonstrated that intravenous nafamostat was rapidly broken down to inactive metabolites. We observed no significant anticoagulant effects in thromboelastometry. Interpretation: In hospitalised patients with COVID-19, we did not observe evidence of anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant or antiviral activity with intravenous nafamostat, and there were additional adverse events. Funding: DEFINE was funded by LifeArc (an independent medical research charity) under the STOPCOVID award to the University of Edinburgh. We also thank the Oxford University COVID-19 Research Response Fund (BRD00230).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23523964
Volume :
76
Issue :
103856-
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EBioMedicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.30aabc317f5544bcb011f0340db28762
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103856