Back to Search Start Over

Faecal examination and PCR to detect Strongyloides venezuelensis in experimentally infected Lewis rats

Authors :
Nelson Mendes Marra
Fernanda Chiuso-Minicucci
Gabriel Capella Machado
Sofia Fernanda Gonçalves Zorzella-Pezavento
Thaís Graziela Donegá França
Larissa Lumi Watanabe Ishikawa
Alessandro FT Amarante
Alexandrina Sartori
Mônica RV Amarante
Source :
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Vol 105, Iss 1, Pp 57-61 (2010)
Publication Year :
2010
Publisher :
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), 2010.

Abstract

More sensitive methodologies are necessary to improve strongyloidiasis diagnosis. This study compared the sensitivities of the McMaster modified technique and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, both performed in faecal samples. Lewis rats were subcutaneously infected with 4,000, 400 or 40 infective third-stage larvae, considered as high, moderate or low infection, respectively. Seven days later, they were euthanized to count adult nematodes recovered from the small intestine. Stool samples were used to count the number of eggs per gram (EPG) of faeces and to detect parasite DNA by PCR performed with a species and a genus primer pair. The sensitivity of these assays depended upon parasite burden and the primer specificity. All assays presented 100% sensitivity at the highest parasite load. In the moderate infection, EPG and PCR with the genus primer maintained 100% specificity, whereas PCR sensitivity with the species primer decreased to 77.7%. In low infection, the sensitivity was 60% for EPG, 0% for PCR with the species primer and 90% for PCR done with the genus primer. Together, these results suggest that PCR with a genus primer can be a very sensitive methodology to detect Strongyloides venezuelensisin faeces of Lewis rats infected with very low parasite burden.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00740276 and 16788060
Volume :
105
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.3097a761a114249a62b2cf518d71a38
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762010000100008