Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Analysis and Functional Annotation of a Large Expressed Sequence Tag Collection of Apple

Authors :
Ksenija Gasic
Delkin O. Gonzalez
Jyothi Thimmapuram
Lei Liu
Mickael Malnoy
George Gong
Yuepeng Han
Lila O. Vodkin
Herb S. Aldwinckle
Natalie J. Carroll
Kathryn S. Orvis
Peter Goldsbrough
Sandra Clifton
Deana Pape
Lucinda Fulton
John Martin
Brenda Theising
Michael E. Wisniewski
Gennaro Fazio
Frank A. Feltus
Schuyler S. Korban
Source :
The Plant Genome, Vol 2, Iss 1, Pp 23-38 (2009)
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
Wiley, 2009.

Abstract

A total of 34 apple ( × Borkh.) cDNA libraries were constructed from root, leaf, bud, shoot, flower, and fruit tissues, at various developmental stages and/or under biotic or abiotic stress conditions, and of several genotypes. From these libraries, 190,425 clones were partially sequenced from the 5′ end and 42,619 clones were sequenced from the 3′ end, and a total of 182,241 high-quality expressed sequence tags (ESTs) were obtained. These coalesced into 23,442 tentative contigs and 9843 singletons, for a total of 33,825 apple unigenes. Functional annotation of this unigene set revealed an even distribution of apple sequences among the three main gene ontology categories. Of ∼33,000 apple unigenes, 8437 (25%) had no detectable homologs ( >0.1) in the genome. When the entire apple unigene set was compared with the entire citrus [ (L.) Osbeck] unigene set and the poplar ( Torr. & Gray) predicted proteome, both members of the core eudicot and rosids clade, 13,521 of apple unigenes matched one or more sequences in citrus, while 25,817 had counterparts in the poplar protein database. Apple––citrus–poplar comparisons revealed closer evolutionary relationships between apple and poplar than with the other two species. Genes involved in basic metabolic pathways appear to be largely conserved among apple, citrus, poplar, and .

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19403372
Volume :
2
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Plant Genome
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.306e3760e5984ff792276298eafe2d28
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2008.11.0014