Back to Search Start Over

Radiation treatment dropouts-Pitfalls and solutions: A retrospective observational study

Authors :
Kanhu Charan Patro
Ajitesh Avinash
Partha Sarathi Bhattacharyya
Venkata Krishna Reddy Pilaka
Mrutyunjayarao Muvvala
Mohanapriya Atchaiyalingam
Keerthiga Karthikeyan
Kaviya Lakshmi Radhakrishnan
Muralikrishna Voonna
Source :
Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 224-231 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications, 2023.

Abstract

Background: Interruptions in radiation treatment are known to have a deleterious effect on oncologic outcomes,specifically, an increase in tumor recurrence and decrease in cancer cure rate. Objectives: Our primary aim was to determine the factors influencing radiotherapy interruptions and provide solutions to decrease these dropouts. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted between May 2009 and July 2010 at Mahatma Gandhi Cancer Hospital and Research Institute, a tertiary cancer center in Vishakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, on patients with histopathologically proven cancer, who were receiving radiation, either as definitive concurrent chemoradiation or in the adjuvant or palliative setting. Before the start and during treatment, patients were counseled by radiation oncologists, radiation coordinators, and radiation therapy technologists. During radiotherapy, an interruption of more than five consecutive days was considered a treatment interruption. Following a treatment interruption, patients were called on the telephone, counseling was done, and the cause of the treatment interruption was recorded and attempts were made to resolve the problem. Results: We enrolled 1200 patients in the study. There were more male (n = 724 [60.4%]) than female (n = 476 [39.6%]) patients. The cohort included 379 patients (31.6%) with carcinoma of the head-and-neck and 301 patients (25.1%) with gynecological malignancies. There were 100 (8.3%) treatment interruptions recorded during the study period. The common causes of radiation interruption were radiation-induced toxicity (n = 20 [20%]), patient death (n = 15 [15%]), financial (n = 15 [15%]), and social (n = 12 [12%]) issues. After counseling over the telephone, treatment could be restarted in 25 (25%) of the 100 patients who had interrupted and stopped radiotherapy. Conclusion: Treatment interruption is relatively common in our patients receiving radiotherapy. To prevent such dropouts and increase compliance to treatment, adequate and frequent counseling before and during radiation treatment is needed.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25903233 and 25903225
Volume :
6
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cancer Research, Statistics, and Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2f20f673611e4e8f9f570ac663a02611
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4103/crst.crst_12_23