Evaluation of the Humanities Resource Construction of University Libraries from the Perspective of the Guarantee Rate of Citation: Taking the Department of Philosophy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University as an Example

[Objective/Significance] Starting from the guarantee rate of citations, this article evaluates the construction effect of both electronic and paper resources in the Humanities at university libraries. [Method/Process] This article takes the department of Philosophy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University as an example. It collected the papers published by the faculty of the department of Philosophy of Shanghai Jiao Tong University for 3 years (2017-2019) and extracted citations to check whether they can be obtained in the University Library. [Results/Conclusions] Statistics show that 31.4% of the citations are not available in the University Library, 8.2% of the citations have alternative documents (such as translations), and 60.4% of the citations are available. This article checks the unsecured citations in the collections of Taiwan University and Fudan University to compare the effects of resource construction between colleges. Through comparative analysis, we can find the shortcomings of resource construction, find the database that mostly needs to be purchased, and provide ideas for resource construction.