Back to Search Start Over

Work‐Family Conflict and Ideal Cardiovascular Health Score in the ELSA‐Brasil Baseline Assessment

Authors :
Priscila T. P. Rocco
Isabela M. Bensenor
Rosane H. Griep
Sandhi M. Barreto
Arlinda B. Moreno
Airlane P. Alencar
Paulo A. Lotufo
Itamar S. Santos
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 8, Iss 20 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

Background There are few data about the association between work‐related stress and the American Heart Association ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) metrics. We studied the association between work‐family conflict (WFC) and ideal CVH scores in the ELSA‐Brasil (Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health) baseline study. Methods and Results We analyzed data of active workers (5424 men and 5967 women), aged 35 to 74 years, from 2008 to 2010. Ideal CVH scores were calculated based on the lifestyle and health metrics proposed by the American Heart Association, using data from questionnaires and clinical and laboratory examinations from the ELSA‐Brasil study baseline. The WFC questionnaire was based on the Frone model, validated for Brazilian Portuguese. WFC domains (time and strain‐based work interference with family, family interference with work, and lack of time for personal care and leisure) and frequency (never to rarely, sometimes, or frequently) were self‐reported. Main models were adjusted for age, sex, race, educational level, income, and study site. Positive relative predicted score differences (rPSDs) indicate higher predicted scores. We found lower lifestyle ideal CVH scores among men (rPSD, −5.7%; P=0.002) and women (rPSD, −10.2%; P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20479980
Volume :
8
Issue :
20
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2d4e25953d1540cebc6281f869153501
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.012701