Back to Search Start Over

COMPARISON OF EUCALYPT, PINE, AND SUGARCANE CELLULOSE FIBERS USED FOR PAPER PRODUCTION

Authors :
Isabela de Paula
Adelsimara Ceballos Guerta
Renata Miliani Martinez
Source :
Revista Árvore, Vol 43, Iss 4 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Sociedade de Investigações Florestais, 2020.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Sugarcane bagasse, a waste material generated by the sugar-alcohol industry, is rich in lignocellulosic components such as cellulose and hemicellulose. The bagasse can be employed as a raw material in the pulp and paper industry, but is currently rarely used for this purpose, due to the availability of traditional sources such as Eucalyptus and Pinus. The objective of this work was to compare the physical and mechanical properties of papers produced using the cellulose extracted from sugarcane, Eucalyptus, and Pinus by the Kraft method. Four paper samples were produced using cellulose obtained from the following fiber sources: (I) 100% sugarcane bagasse; (II) 100% Eucalyptus; (III) 75% Eucalyptus + 25% Pinus; (IV) 75% sugarcane bagasse + 25% Pinus. Physical and mechanical tests were performed based on regulatory methodologies of the paper industry. The results indicated that the physical and mechanical characteristics of the paper produced from the sugarcane cellulose were similar to those of the traditional paper produced using Eucalyptus. Particular features such as good tearing resistance and tensile strength, as well as increased porosity and moisture, could be adjusted according to the intended use of the paper. Therefore, sugarcane bagasse can be considered a sustainable alternative to Eucalyptus and Pinus for the production of high quality paper, adding value to this agricultural residue.

Details

Language :
English, Spanish; Castilian, Portuguese
ISSN :
18069088
Volume :
43
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Revista Árvore
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2cdc26c464d0462193e9619422b3f579
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-90882019000400011