Back to Search Start Over

Estimation of Input Costs for a Markov Model in a German Health Economic Evaluation of Newer Antidepressants

Authors :
Astrid Seidl
Marion Danner
Christoph J. Wagner
Frank G. Sandmann
Gaby Sroczynski
Heidi Stürzlinger
Johannes Zsifkovits
Anja Schwalm
Stefan K. Lhachimi
Uwe Siebert
Andreas Gerber-Grote
Source :
MDM Policy & Practice, Vol 3 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
SAGE Publishing, 2018.

Abstract

Background: Estimating input costs for Markov models in health economic evaluations requires health state–specific costing. This is a challenge in mental illnesses such as depression, as interventions are not clearly related to health states. We present a hybrid approach to health state–specific cost estimation for a German health economic evaluation of antidepressants. Methods: Costs were determined from the perspective of the community of persons insured by statutory health insurance (“SHI insuree perspective”) and included costs for outpatient care, inpatient care, drugs, and psychotherapy. In an additional step, costs for rehabilitation and productivity losses were calculated from the societal perspective. We collected resource use data in a stepwise hierarchical approach using SHI claims data, where available, followed by data from clinical guidelines and expert surveys. Bottom-up and top-down costing approaches were combined. Results: Depending on the drug strategy and health state, the average input costs varied per patient per 8-week Markov cycle. The highest costs occurred for agomelatine in the health state first-line treatment (FT) (“FT relapse”) with €506 from the SHI insuree perspective and €724 from the societal perspective. From both perspectives, the lowest costs (excluding placebo) were €55 for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the health state “FT remission.” Conclusion: To estimate costs in health economic evaluations of treatments for depression, it can be necessary to link different data sources and costing approaches systematically to meet the requirements of the decision-analytic model. As this can increase complexity, the corresponding calculations should be presented transparently. The approach presented could provide useful input for future models.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine (General)
R5-920

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23814683
Volume :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
MDM Policy & Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2baf20b1d5f479ebbb32fecde4abd84
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317751923