Back to Search Start Over

Three vs. Four Cycles of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Localized Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Undergoing Radical Cystectomy: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis

Authors :
Matteo Ferro
Ottavio de Cobelli
Gennaro Musi
Giuseppe Lucarelli
Daniela Terracciano
Daniela Pacella
Tommaso Muto
Angelo Porreca
Gian Maria Busetto
Francesco Del Giudice
Francesco Soria
Paolo Gontero
Francesco Cantiello
Rocco Damiano
Fabio Crocerossa
Abdal Rahman Abu Farhan
Riccardo Autorino
Mihai Dorin Vartolomei
Matteo Muto
Michele Marchioni
Andrea Mari
Luca Scafuri
Andrea Minervini
Nicola Longo
Francesco Chiancone
Sisto Perdona
Pietro De Placido
Antonio Verde
Michele Catellani
Stefano Luzzago
Francesco Alessandro Mistretta
Pasquale Ditonno
Vincenzo Francesco Caputo
Michele Battaglia
Stefania Zamboni
Alessandro Antonelli
Francesco Greco
Giorgio Ivan Russo
Rodolfo Hurle
Nicolae Crisan
Matteo Manfredi
Francesco Porpiglia
Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
Felice Crocetto
Carlo Buonerba
Source :
Frontiers in Oncology, Vol 11 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Frontiers Media S.A., 2021.

Abstract

BackgroundThree or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard neoadjuvant treatment prior to cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Although NCCN guidelines recommend 4 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine, three cycles are also commonly administered in clinical practice. In this multicenter retrospective study, we assessed a large and homogenous cohort of patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC) treated with three or four cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine followed by radical cystectomy, in order to explore whether three vs. four cycles were associated with different outcomes.MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed muscle-invasive UBC included in this retrospective study had to be treated with either 3 (cohort A) or 4 (cohort B) cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine as neoadjuvant therapy before undergoing radical cystectomy with lymphadenectomy. Outcomes including pathologic downstaging to non-muscle invasive disease, pathologic complete response (defined as absence of disease -ypT0), overall- and cancer-specific- survival as well as time to recurrence were compared between cohorts A vs. B.ResultsA total of 219 patients treated at 14 different high-volume Institutions were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received 3 (cohort A) vs. 4 (cohort B) cycles of neoadjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine were 160 (73,1%) vs. 59 (26,9%).At univariate analysis, the number of neoadjuvant cycles was not associated with either pathologic complete response, pathologic downstaging, time to recurrence, cancer specific, and overall survival. Of note, patients in cohort B vs. A showed a worse non-cancer specific overall survival at univariate analysis (HR= 2.53; 95 CI= 1.05 - 6.10; p=0.046), although this finding was not confirmed at multivariate analysis.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that 3 cycles of cisplatin-gemcitabine may be equally effective, with less long-term toxicity, compared to 4 cycles in the neoadjuvant setting.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2234943X
Volume :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Frontiers in Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2ba37d713d7a40cb85bfb53ae5a8709f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.651745