Back to Search Start Over

Early Survivorship of Newly Designed Highly Porous Metaphyseal Tibial Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Authors :
Brian P. Chalmers, MD
Christina M. Malfer, BS
David J. Mayman, MD
Geoffrey H. Westrich, MD
Peter K. Sculco, MD
Mathias P. Bostrom, MD
Seth A. Jerabek, MD
Source :
Arthroplasty Today, Vol 8, Iss , Pp 5-10 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

Background: Metaphyseal cones provide durable fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of data on the outcomes of a new porous cone design. As such, the goal of this study was to analyze the early survivorship in patients undergoing revision TKA with this cone. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 163 revision TKAs with a newly designed porous tibial cone from 2016 to 2018. Mean age was 67 years, and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m2. Minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. Most patients were revised for aseptic loosening (46%), 2-stage periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) reimplantation (28%), or instability (15%). Most were varus-valgus constrained (65%) or hinged (32%) constructs. The majority had hybrid tibial stem fixation (74%). A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for reoperation. Results: Survivorship free from re-revision for aseptic loosening, any nonmodular revision, and any reoperation was 100%, 96%, and 86% at 2 years, respectively. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening. Six (4%) tibial cones were removed for PJI, one of which was loose. There were 23 reoperations (14%), most commonly for PJI (10%). Multivariate analysis identified PJI reimplantation (hazard ratios [HR] = 4.2, P = .002), males (HR = 2.9, P = .02), and hinged constructs (HR = 2.7, P = .02) as significant risk factors for reoperation. Conclusions: In a complex revision TKA cohort with a new highly porous tibial cone, in which most patients received hybrid stem fixation and nonlinked and linked constraint, there was 100% survival free from re-revision for aseptic loosening at 2 years. Longer term follow-up is required.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23523441
Volume :
8
Issue :
5-10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Arthroplasty Today
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.283f564d33f64a478488563c8f2ad9b3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.01.004