Back to Search Start Over

Mid- to late-term follow-up of primary hip and knee arthroplasty: the UK SAFE evidence-based recommendations

Authors :
Sarah R. Kingsbury
Lindsay K. K. Smith
Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
Andrew Judge
Robert West
Judy M. Wright
Martin H. Stone
Philip G. Conaghan
Source :
Bone & Joint Open, Vol 4, Iss 2, Pp 72-78 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2023.

Abstract

Aims: To review the evidence and reach consensus on recommendations for follow-up after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Methods: A programme of work was conducted, including: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effectiveness literature; analysis of routine national datasets to identify pre-, peri-, and postoperative predictors of mid-to-late term revision; prospective data analyses from 560 patients to understand how patients present for revision surgery; qualitative interviews with NHS managers and orthopaedic surgeons; and health economic modelling. Finally, a consensus meeting considered all the work and agreed the final recommendations and research areas. Results: The UK poSt Arthroplasty Follow-up rEcommendations (UK SAFE) recommendations apply to post-primary hip and knee arthroplasty follow-up. The ten-year time point is based on a lack of robust evidence beyond ten years. The term 'complex cases' refers to individual patient and surgical factors that may increase the risk for arthroplasty failure. For Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A* minimum implants, it is safe to disinvest in routine follow-up from one to years post-non-complex hip and knee arthroplasty provided there is rapid access to orthopaedic review. For ODEP 10A* minimum implants in complex cases, or non-ODEP 10A* minimum implants, periodic follow-up post-hip and knee arthroplasty may be required from one to ten years. At ten years post-hip and knee arthroplasty, clinical and radiological evaluation is recommended. After ten years post-hip and knee arthroplasty, frequency of further follow-up should be based on the ten-year assessment; ongoing rapid access to orthopaedic review is still required. Conclusion: Complex cases, implants not meeting the ODEP 10A* criteria, and follow-up after revision surgery are not covered by this recommendation. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2023;4(2):72–78.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26331462
Volume :
4
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Bone & Joint Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.27a87f52c81f4b668631bc9fe695fe8a
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.42.BJO-2022-0149.R1