Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (NCIMB 30229) as a silage additive for all animal species

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP)
Guido Rychen
Gabriele Aquilina
Giovanna Azimonti
Vasileios Bampidis
Maria de Lourdes Bastos
Georges Bories
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Gerhard Flachowsky
Jürgen Gropp
Boris Kolar
Maryline Kouba
Marta López Alonso
Secundino López Puente
Alberto Mantovani
Baltasar Mayo
Fernando Ramos
Roberto Edoardo Villa
Robert John Wallace
Pieter Wester
Rosella Brozzi
Maria Saarela
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 15, Iss 6, Pp n/a-n/a (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract The additive under assessment is a preparation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NCIMB 3022 intended for use as a technological additive in forages for all animal species at a proposed minimum dose of 5 × 107 CFU/kg fresh materials. The species B. amyloliquefaciens is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the qualified presumption of safety approach to safety assessment. This approach requires the identification of the strain and evidence that it is not toxigenic and does not show acquired resistance to relevant antibiotics. In a previous assessment, the identity and susceptibility to clinically relevant antibiotics of the active agent was established but the lack of toxigenic potential could not be demonstrated. Therefore, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) could not conclude on the safety of the product for target animals, consumers, users or the environment. In the same opinion, the potential of the additive to improve aerobic stability of silages at the proposed dose was not convincingly demonstrated. A new cytotoxicity study was conducted using methanol extracts. The methanol extract was cytotoxic at the inclusion level of 5%, while no cytotoxicity was observed at lower concentrations. The current guidance on Bacillus requires absence of toxic effect using the non‐concentrated supernatant. Since the applicant was unable to determine the correlation between the methanol extracts and the Bacillus supernatant concentrations, the FEEDAP Panel is unable to conclude on the toxigenic potential of the strain based on the current data. An additional efficacy study with a similar protocol to the ones previously assessed was conducted. The study showed an improved aerobic stability when added to forage at the proposed dose. However, the FEEDAP Panel remains unable to conclude on the efficacy of the additive to improve the ensiling process on the basis of a single positive result.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
15
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.2707c2b882b94cbeb8315e46af2dee07
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4860