Back to Search Start Over

Scientific Opinion on Flavouring Group Evaluation 73, Revision 5 (FGE.73Rev5): consideration of alicyclic alcohols, aldehydes, acids and related esters evaluated by JECFA (59th, 63rd and 86th meeting) and structurally related to substances evaluated in FGE.12Rev5

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF)
Maged Younes
Gabriele Aquilina
Laurence Castle
Karl‐Heinz Engel
Paul Fowler
Maria Jose Frutos Fernandez
Peter Fürst
Ursula Gundert‐Remy
Rainer Gürtler
Trine Husøy
Peter Moldeus
Agneta Oskarsson
Romina Shah
Ine Waalkens‐Berendsen
Detlef Wölfle
Romualdo Benigni
Claudia Bolognesi
Kevin Chipman
Eugenia Cordelli
Gisela Degen
Daniel Marzin
Camilla Svendsen
Maria Carfì
Carla Martino
Wim Mennes
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 18, Iss 1, Pp n/a-n/a (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Wiley, 2020.

Abstract

Abstract The EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings was requested to evaluate 24 flavouring substances assigned to the Flavouring Group Evaluation 73 (FGE.73), using the Procedure as outlined in the Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. Twenty‐three substances have already been considered in FGE.73 and its four revisions ([FL‐no: 02.114, 02.141, 05.098, 05.112, 08.067, 09.289, 09.488, 09.534, 09.615, 05.119, 05.123, 08.034, 08.060, 09.028, 09.536, 05.104, 09.034, 09.712, 09.305, 02.060, 02.091, 09.278, 09.302]). The remaining substance myrtenal [FL‐no: 05.106] has been cleared with respect to genotoxicity in FGE.208Rev3 and is considered in this revision 5 of FGE.73. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach that integrates information on the structure–activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern (TTC), and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel concluded that none of these 24 substances gives rise to safety concerns at their levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the ‘Maximised Survey‐derived Daily Intake’ (MSDI) approach. Besides the safety assessment of the flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered and found adequate for 23 substances. For [FL‐no: 09.278], the stereoisomeric composition is not specified. For two substances [FL‐no: 09.034, and 09.712], the modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake (mTAMDI) estimates are above the TTC for their structural class (I). For 17 substances evaluated through the Procedure, no normal and maximum use levels are available. Therefore, for these 19 substances, more detailed data on uses and use levels should be provided in order to refine their exposure assessments and to finalise their safety evaluations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
18
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.26c0ed55cdc4f80ae5fa66ddcb453a5
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5970