Effect of Dorsal Closing Wedge Calcaneal Osteotomy on Foot Alignment and Biomechanics in Patients with Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy

Category: Hindfoot; Sports Introduction/Purpose: The use of a dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (DCWCO) in the treatment of insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) has recently gained popularity. The anatomical changes imposed by the osteotomy are believed to improve both the biological and mechanical processes involved in IAT. However, the impact of shortening the Achilles leverage arm after DCWCO and the full impact of DCWCO on foot anatomy and function is not well understood. This study aimed to examine the effects of DCWCO on the 3D alignment and biomechanics of the foot and ankle in IAT patients through simulated models of DCWCO. The hypothesis was that DCWCO would significantly impact foot alignment and decrease gastrocsoleus lever arm. Methods: Six weightbearing ankle CTs of patients with IAT were identified from the clinical database. Bone segmentation was performed and DCWCOs were conducted in standardized planes with six variations, resulting in a total of 36 foot models. Two plantar osteotomy starting points were defined as 1-cm anterior (posterior osteotomy) and 2-cm anterior (anterior osteotomy) to the most plantar point of calcaneus. The osteotomies were extended to dorsal surface at 1-cm anterior to posterosuperior calcaneus with 6, 10, or 14-mm wedges anteriorly. After the osteotomies, the posterior part of the calcaneus was rotated around the plantar starting point until proper bone contact was achieved. Achilles reconstruction was also performed using pre-defined Achilles insertion points. All models were then transferred to a MATLAB-based algorithm for automated measurements. These measurements included talocalcaneal, calcaneal pitch, Böhler, and Achilles tendon sagittal angles, Achilles moment arm, Achilles- posterosuperior calcaneus distance, and difference in soleus-Achilles length. Results: Anteriorly placed osteotomy caused more significant decrease in the Böhler angle (p < 0.001). Evaluation of the posteriorly placed osteotomy separately showed no significant decrease in the Böhler angle for patients with more than 30- degrees of preoperative Böhler angle (p=0.26). However, patients with a preoperative Böhler angle less than 30-degrees showed a significant decrease, approaching values close to 5-degrees (p=0.004). Gastrocsoleus moment arm decrease was found to be 2-3% by using force/moment equation. The change in the distance between Achilles tendon and the posterosuperior calcaneus was similar between anterior and posterior osteotomies, with less than 3-mm in a 6-mm wedge and more than 5-mm in a 10-mm wedge osteotomy. The calculations showed that ankle dorsiflexion can increase by one degree for each mm of resection. Conclusion: An anteriorly placed starting point for a DCWCO can negatively affect foot alignment and offer limited benefits for Achilles decompression. If the preoperative Böhler angle is less than 30, a DCWCO can significantly decrease the Böhler angle, potentially putting the subtalar joint at risk for arthritis by increasing the load as reported by some finite element studies. The maximum decrease in gastrocsoleus power is less than 3%, which may be clinically insignificant. A posterior starting point with 10- mm wedge can be adequate to move Haglund around 5-mm anteriorly and can move Achilles insertion 10-mm superiorly to decrease tension.