Back to Search Start Over

Impact of Complete Revascularization on Development of Heart Failure in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome and Multivessel Disease: A Subanalysis of the CORALYS Registry

Authors :
Francesco Bruno
Giorgio Marengo
Ovidio De Filippo
Wojciech Wanha
Sergio Leonardi
Sergio Raposeiras Roubin
Enrico Fabris
Maja Popovic
Giuseppe Giannino
Alessandra Truffa
Zenon Huczek
Nicola Gaibazzi
Alfonso Ielasi
Bernardo Cortese
Andrea Borin
Iván J. Núñez‐Gil
Daniele Melis
Fabrizio Ugo
Matteo Bianco
Lucia Barbieri
Federico Marchini
Piotr Desperak
Claudio Montalto
Maria Melendo‐Viu
Edoardo Elia
Massimo Mancone
Andrea Buono
Marcos Ferrandez‐Escarabajal
Nuccia Morici
Marco Scaglione
Domenico Tuttolomondo
Gennaro Sardella
Mariusz Gasior
Maciej Mazurek
Guglielmo Gallone
Beniamino Pagliaro
Clara Lopiano
Gianluca Campo
Wojciech Wojakowski
Emad Abu‐Assi
Gianfranco Sinagra
Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
Fabrizio D'Ascenzo
Source :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, Vol 12, Iss 15 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Background The impact of complete revascularization (CR) on the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention remains to be elucidated. Methods and Results Consecutive patients with acute coronary syndrome with multivessel coronary artery disease from the CORALYS (Incidence and Predictors of Heart Failure After Acute Coronary Syndrome) registry were included. Incidence of first hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death was the primary end point. Patients were stratified according to completeness of coronary revascularization. Of 14 699 patients in the CORALYS registry, 5054 presented with multivessel disease. One thousand four hundred seventy‐three (29.2%) underwent CR, while 3581 (70.8%) did not. Over 5 years follow‐up, CR was associated with a reduced incidence of the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.51–0.85]), first HF hospitalization (adjusted HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49–0.90]) along with all‐cause death and cardiovascular death alone (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56–0.97] and HR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.38–0.84], respectively). The results were consistent in the propensity‐score matching population and in inverse probability treatment weighting analysis. The benefit of CR was consistent across acute coronary syndrome presentations (HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39–0.89] for ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and HR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.50–0.99] for non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome) and in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40% (HR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.37–0.72]), while no benefit was observed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% (HR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.37–1.10], P for interaction 0.04). Conclusions CR after acute coronary syndrome reduced the risk of first hospitalization for HF and cardiovascular death, as well as first HF hospitalization, and cardiovascular and overall death both in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction and non‐ST‐elevation acute coronary syndrome. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT 04895176.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20479980
Volume :
12
Issue :
15
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.245ff06e5ede4b42b2637ea28705cf2d
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.122.028475