Back to Search Start Over

Updated peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance dichlorprop‐P and variant dichlorprop‐P‐2‐ethylhexyl

Authors :
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Fernando Álvarez
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Sofia Batista Leite
Marco Binaglia
Anna Federica Castoldi
Arianna Chiusolo
Angelo Colagiorgi
Mathilde Colas
Federica Crivellente
Chloe De Lentdecker
Isabella De Magistris
Mark Egsmose
Gabriella Fait
Franco Ferilli
Varvara Gouliarmou
Katrin Halling
Laia Herrero Nogareda
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Aude Kienzler
Anna Lanzoni
Roberto Lava
Renata Leuschner
Alberto Linguadoca
Jochem Louisse
Christopher Lythgo
Oriol Magrans
Iris Mangas
Galini Mavriou
Andrea Mioč
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Vincenzo Padricello
Martina Panzarea
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Simone Rizzuto
Anamarija Romac
Agnès Rortais
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Csaba Szentes
Andrea Terron
Anne Theobald
Manuela Tiramani
Giorgia Vianello
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 22, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Ireland, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Poland, for the pesticide active substance dichlorprop‐P and the variant dichlorprop‐P‐2‐ethylhexyl and the assessment of applications for maximum residue levels (MRLs) are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of dichlorprop‐P as a herbicide on cereals, grassland and grass seed crops and of the variant dichlorprop‐P‐2‐ethylhexyl as a plant growth regulator on citrus. MRLs were assessed in mandarin and lemon. The conclusions from 2018 were updated in 2024 following the request from the European Commission with regard to the endocrine‐disrupting properties. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment and the proposed MRLs, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are reported where identified.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
22
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1e576c216e87465bbabe0bb1a724a472
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8658