Back to Search Start Over

The efficacy and safety of high‐pressure processing of food

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ Panel)
Konstantinos Koutsoumanis
Avelino Alvarez‐Ordóñez
Declan Bolton
Sara Bover‐Cid
Marianne Chemaly
Robert Davies
Alessandra De Cesare
Lieve Herman
Friederike Hilbert
Roland Lindqvist
Maarten Nauta
Luisa Peixe
Giuseppe Ru
Marion Simmons
Panagiotis Skandamis
Elisabetta Suffredini
Laurence Castle
Matteo Crotta
Konrad Grob
Maria Rosaria Milana
Annette Petersen
Artur Xavier Roig Sagués
Filipa Vinagre Silva
Eric Barthélémy
Anna Christodoulidou
Winy Messens
Ana Allende
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 20, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2022)
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Wiley, 2022.

Abstract

Abstract High‐pressure processing (HPP) is a non‐thermal treatment in which, for microbial inactivation, foods are subjected to isostatic pressures (P) of 400–600 MPa with common holding times (t) from 1.5 to 6 min. The main factors that influence the efficacy (log10 reduction of vegetative microorganisms) of HPP when applied to foodstuffs are intrinsic (e.g. water activity and pH), extrinsic (P and t) and microorganism‐related (type, taxonomic unit, strain and physiological state). It was concluded that HPP of food will not present any additional microbial or chemical food safety concerns when compared to other routinely applied treatments (e.g. pasteurisation). Pathogen reductions in milk/colostrum caused by the current HPP conditions applied by the industry are lower than those achieved by the legal requirements for thermal pasteurisation. However, HPP minimum requirements (P/t combinations) could be identified to achieve specific log10 reductions of relevant hazards based on performance criteria (PC) proposed by international standard agencies (5–8 log10 reductions). The most stringent HPP conditions used industrially (600 MPa, 6 min) would achieve the above‐mentioned PC, except for Staphylococcus aureus. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), the endogenous milk enzyme that is widely used to verify adequate thermal pasteurisation of cows’ milk, is relatively pressure resistant and its use would be limited to that of an overprocessing indicator. Current data are not robust enough to support the proposal of an appropriate indicator to verify the efficacy of HPP under the current HPP conditions applied by the industry. Minimum HPP requirements to reduce Listeria monocytogenes levels by specific log10 reductions could be identified when HPP is applied to ready‐to‐eat (RTE) cooked meat products, but not for other types of RTE foods. These identified minimum requirements would result in the inactivation of other relevant pathogens (Salmonella and Escherichia coli) in these RTE foods to a similar or higher extent.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
20
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1d102349569445cbb1e359be7f51bacb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7128