Back to Search Start Over

Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy

Authors :
Rachel Meacock
Jo Rycroft-Malone
Steven H Jones
Mat Rawsthorne
Elena Semino
Nick Shryane
Fiona Lobban
Heather Robinson
Paul Rayson
Emma Donaldson
Paul Marshall
Zoe Glossop
Rose Johnston
Christopher Lodge
Karen Machin
Matthew Coole
Jade Haines
Kate Penhaligon
Tamara Rakić
Sara Wise
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 13, Iss 7 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2023.

Abstract

Introduction Peer online mental health forums are commonly used and offer accessible support. Positive and negative impacts have been reported by forum members and moderators, but it is unclear why these impacts occur, for whom and in which forums. This multiple method realist study explores underlying mechanisms to understand how forums work for different people. The findings will inform codesign of best practice guidance and policy tools to enhance the uptake and effectiveness of peer online mental health forums.Methods and analysis In workstream 1, we will conduct a realist synthesis, based on existing literature and interviews with approximately 20 stakeholders, to generate initial programme theories about the impacts of forums on members and moderators and mechanisms driving these. Initial theories that are relevant for forum design and implementation will be prioritised for testing in workstream 2.Workstream 2 is a multiple case study design with mixed methods with several online mental health forums differing in contextual features. Quantitative surveys of forum members, qualitative interviews and Corpus-based Discourse Analysis and Natural Language Processing of forum posts will be used to test and refine programme theories. Final programme theories will be developed through novel triangulation of the data.Workstream 3 will run alongside workstreams 1 and 2. Key stakeholders from participating forums, including members and moderators, will be recruited to a Codesign group. They will inform the study design and materials, refine and prioritise theories, and codesign best policy and practice guidance.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by Solihull Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 314029). Findings will be reported in accordance with RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidelines, published as open access and shared widely, along with codesigned tools.Trial registration number ISRCTN 62469166; the protocol for the realist synthesis in workstream one is prospectively registered at PROSPERO CRD42022352528.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
13
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1c9cde5c931041f9a650a8d53b2c5eda
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142