Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Dose between Filtered Back Projection and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction in CT Head: A Cross-sectional Study

Introduction: Computed Tomography (CT) scans account for only 15% of total diagnostic procedures but for over half of the collective dose of radiation. The increasing awareness about the harmful effects of radiation has also created a need for developing techniques that decrease radiation exposure while at the same time providing a reasonably good image quality. The majority of the CT units today use Filtered Back Projection (FBP) as the means of image reconstruction. However, FBP leads to coupling between image noise and radiation exposure and limits the dose reduction possible while providing diagnostic quality images. Second-generation Iterative Reconstruction (IR) techniques have caught the attention of medical researchers because they provide a superior image quality than FBP at the same radiation dose showing potential for dose reduction. Aim: To compare the image quality and radiation dose in standard dose CT head reconstructed with FBP and low dose CT head reconstructed with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE) and FBP both. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 100 patients in the emergency department of Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital in India from November 2018 to April 2020. Patients referred for emergency Non-contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) head for any indication excluding post-op cases and those with metallic artifacts were included. Fifty patients chosen using systematic random sampling underwent low-dose CT head using the Care Dose 4D Automatic Exposure Control (AEC) system with reconstruction using SAFIRE (Group-A) and FBP (Group-B). Another 50 patients who were within five years of the corresponding Group-A and B patients underwent standard dose head CT reconstruction using FBP (Group-C). CTDI vol, DLP, and effective dose were recorded in all patients. Image quality was assessed objectively using the unpaired t-test for Group-A and C and paired t-test for Group-A and B. Subjective image analysis between the groups was done using a 4-point Likert scale. Results: Image quality parameters were found to be better in Group-A compared to Group-C (p