Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of a risk score predicting substantial weight gain over 5 years in middle-aged European men and women.

Authors :
Annika Steffen
Thorkild I A Sørensen
Sven Knüppel
Noemie Travier
María-José Sánchez
José María Huerta
J Ramón Quirós
Eva Ardanaz
Miren Dorronsoro
Birgit Teucher
Kuanrong Li
H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita
Daphne van der A
Amalia Mattiello
Domenico Palli
Rosario Tumino
Vittorio Krogh
Paolo Vineis
Antonia Trichopoulou
Philippos Orfanos
Dimitrios Trichopoulos
Bo Hedblad
Peter Wallström
Kim Overvad
Jytte Halkjær
Anne Tjønneland
Guy Fagherazzi
Laureen Dartois
Francesca Crowe
Kay-Tee Khaw
Nick Wareham
Lefkos Middleton
Anne M May
Petra H M Peeters
Heiner Boeing
Source :
PLoS ONE, Vol 8, Iss 7, p e67429 (2013)
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Identifying individuals at high risk of excess weight gain may help targeting prevention efforts at those at risk of various metabolic diseases associated with weight gain. Our aim was to develop a risk score to identify these individuals and validate it in an external population. METHODS:We used lifestyle and nutritional data from 53°758 individuals followed for a median of 5.4 years from six centers of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) to develop a risk score to predict substantial weight gain (SWG) for the next 5 years (derivation sample). Assuming linear weight gain, SWG was defined as gaining ≥ 10% of baseline weight during follow-up. Proportional hazards models were used to identify significant predictors of SWG separately by EPIC center. Regression coefficients of predictors were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled coefficients were used to assign weights to each predictor. The risk score was calculated as a linear combination of the predictors. External validity of the score was evaluated in nine other centers of the EPIC study (validation sample). RESULTS:Our final model included age, sex, baseline weight, level of education, baseline smoking, sports activity, alcohol use, and intake of six food groups. The model's discriminatory ability measured by the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.64 (95% CI = 0.63-0.65) in the derivation sample and 0.57 (95% CI = 0.56-0.58) in the validation sample, with variation between centers. Positive and negative predictive values for the optimal cut-off value of ≥ 200 points were 9% and 96%, respectively. CONCLUSION:The present risk score confidently excluded a large proportion of individuals from being at any appreciable risk to develop SWG within the next 5 years. Future studies, however, may attempt to further refine the positive prediction of the score.

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine
Science

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
8
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1b7f59549811441da238606c0f4e6d36
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067429