Back to Search Start Over

Outcome of acute respiratory distress syndrome in university and non-university hospitals in Germany

Authors :
Konstantinos Raymondos
Tamme Dirks
Michael Quintel
Ulrich Molitoris
Jörg Ahrens
Thorben Dieck
Kai Johanning
Dietrich Henzler
Rolf Rossaint
Christian Putensen
Hermann Wrigge
Ralph Wittich
Maximilian Ragaller
Thomas Bein
Martin Beiderlinden
Maxi Sanmann
Christian Rabe
Jörn Schlechtweg
Monika Holler
Fernando Frutos-Vivar
Andres Esteban
Hartmut Hecker
Simone Rosseau
Vera von Dossow
Claudia Spies
Tobias Welte
Siegfried Piepenbrock
Steffen Weber-Carstens
Source :
Critical Care, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-17 (2017)
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
BMC, 2017.

Abstract

Abstract Background This study investigates differences in treatment and outcome of ventilated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) between university and non-university hospitals in Germany. Methods This subanalysis of a prospective, observational cohort study was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality by examining: baseline factors, ventilator settings (e.g., driving pressure), complications, and care settings—for example, case volume of ventilated patients, size/type of intensive care unit (ICU), and type of hospital (university/non-university hospital). To control for potentially confounding factors at ARDS onset and to verify differences in mortality, ARDS patients in university vs non-university hospitals were compared using additional multivariable analysis. Results Of the 7540 patients admitted to 95 ICUs from 18 university and 62 non-university hospitals in May 2004, 1028 received mechanical ventilation and 198 developed ARDS. Although the characteristics of ARDS patients were very similar, hospital mortality was considerably lower in university compared with non-university hospitals (39.3% vs 57.5%; p = 0.012). Treatment in non-university hospitals was independently associated with increased mortality (OR (95% CI): 2.89 (1.31–6.38); p = 0.008). This was confirmed by additional independent comparisons between the two patient groups when controlling for confounding factors at ARDS onset. Higher driving pressures (OR 1.10; 1 cmH2O increments) were also independently associated with higher mortality. Compared with non-university hospitals, higher positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (mean ± SD: 11.7 ± 4.7 vs 9.7 ± 3.7 cmH2O; p = 0.005) and lower driving pressures (15.1 ± 4.4 vs 17.0 ± 5.0 cmH2O; p = 0.02) were applied during therapeutic ventilation in university hospitals, and ventilation lasted twice as long (median (IQR): 16 (9–29) vs 8 (3–16) days; p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1b228354f3945228778f8baae58bc7c
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1687-0