Back to Search Start Over

The Concept of Stare Decisis in the German Legal System – a Systematically Inconsistent Concept with High Factual Importance

Authors :
Peter Stainer
Dominik König
Source :
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, Vol 27, Iss 1 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, 2018.

Abstract

It is worth mentioning that the German legal system is based on the codified law. This system lacks in stare decisis and precedents in general, which – in principle – does not raise doubts. The role of precedent in the decisional process is relative and dependent on the question as to whether the case may be resolved pursuant to a legal act. In that case, precedents would not play any or almost any role at all. However, the role of precedents increases, when there is a lack of appropriate legal rights, or if legal rights require interpretation. It should be emphasised that stare decisis understood as a formally binding precedent refers only to rulings issued by the Federal Constitutional Court, whereas precedents of higher courts have a significant meaning to everyday judicial practice in Germany, despite the fact that they are not formally binding.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17316375
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Studia Iuridica Lublinensia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1a254ff98a8f4a04aa8bcfc32ee8deb3
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.121