Back to Search Start Over

Combining Sensitive Crossmatch Assays With Donor/Recipient Human Leukocyte Antigen Eplet Matching Predicts Living-Donor Kidney Transplant Outcome

Authors :
Maria Meneghini
Edoardo Melilli
Jaume Martorell
Ignacio Revuelta
Elisabet Rigol-Monzó
Anna Manonelles
Nuria Montero
David Cucchiari
Fritz Diekmann
Josep M. Cruzado
Salvador Gil-Vernet
Josep M. Grinyó
Oriol Bestard
Source :
Kidney International Reports, Vol 3, Iss 4, Pp 926-938 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2018.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the different assays available for immune-risk stratification before living-donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), the precise type and number of tests to perform remain uncertain. Methods: In a cohort of 330 consecutive LDKT patients, all of which were complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC)−crossmatch negative, we retrospectively analyzed the impact on main clinical outcomes of most sensitive immunoassays (complement-dependent cytotoxicity−panel-reactive antibody [CDC-PRA], flow cytometry crossmatch [FC-XM], donor-specific antibodies [DSAs], and their complement-binding capacity DSA-C3d]), together with donor/recipient HLA eplet matching. Mean follow-up was 67 months (range 24−190 months). Results: Of 330 patients, 35 (11%) showed a CDC-PRA >20%; 17 (5%) FC-XM+; 30 (9%) DSA+, 18(5%) DSA-C3d+, with low overlapping results (10 patients positive in all donor-specific tests). Unlike HLA allele compatibility, the mean number of HLA class II eplet mismatches was higher in LDKT patients with positive baseline test results. DSA-C3d+ showed higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA, with a cut-off MFI of 6192 accurately predicting complement fixation (area under the curve = 0.85, P = 0.008). Although all assays were associated with acute rejection (AR), only DSA-C3d+ (odds ratio [OR] = 6.64, P = 0.038) or high MFI-DSA (OR = 7.54, P = 0.038) independently predicted AR. Likewise, poorly HLA class II eplet−matched patients were at higher risk for AR, particularly patients with negative baseline test results (OR = 1.14, P = 0.019). Finally, previous AR and FC-XM+/DSA+, regardless of C3d positivity, independently predicted graft loss. Conclusion: Combining FC-XM and solid-phase assays with the evaluation of donor/recipient HLA eplet mismatches, are most accurate tools for immune-risk stratification prior LDKT. Keywords: acute rejection, crossmatch immunoassays, donor-specific antibodies, HLA matchmaker, immune risk stratification, living donor kidney transplantation

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
24680249
Volume :
3
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Kidney International Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1938b812310148018d19c55e572d9b93
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ekir.2018.03.015