Back to Search Start Over

A Co-Induction Technique Utilizing 4% Sevoflurane Followed by 0.75 mg/kg Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Procedures: A Prospective Randomized Control Study

Authors :
Omar A. Ababneh
Aiman M. Suleiman
Isam K. Bsisu
Subhi M. Al-Ghanem
Walid K. Samarah
Khaled R. Al-Zaben
Ibraheem Y. Qudaisat
Lubna A. Khreesha
Ghazi M. Al Edwan
Mujalli M. Murshidi
Source :
Medicina, Vol 56, Iss 12, p 682 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
MDPI AG, 2020.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Elderly patients constitute a large segment of healthcare receivers. Considering the functional deterioration of multiple organ systems with aging, achieving a safe perioperative approach is challenging. Our aim is to study the safety and effectiveness of a genuinely regimented co-induction technique in order to minimize anesthesia-related complications. Materials and Methods: One hundred and five patients were assigned to three groups according to the induction technique: propofol, sevoflurane and co-induction group. Inclusion criteria: patients with age ≥65 and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) II-III who underwent endoscopic urological procedures. The propofol group received a dose of 1.5 mg kg−1 of propofol over two minutes for induction. The sevoflurane group received 8% of sevoflurane and 100% oxygen through a plastic facemask with the fresh gas flow set at 8 L min−1. The co-induction group received 4% sevoflurane through plastic facemask for two minutes, followed by a 0.75 mg kg−1 dose of propofol. After ensuring full range jaw relaxation, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted. Results: Overall, the co-induction technique had a favorable profile in terms of respiratory adverse events, while the sevoflurane group had a favorable profile in terms of hemodynamic stability. Furthermore, 24 (68.6%) patients receiving inhalational sevoflurane had episodes of transient apnea, which constitutes 77.4% of the 31 episodes of transient apnea in the studied sample (p < 0.001). Moreover, six (17.1%) patients in the sevoflurane group had an episode of partial laryngospasm (p = 0.034). Compared with the co-induction group, we found that the propofol group had significantly less systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the second minute, with p values of (0.018) and (0.015), respectively. Conclusions: The co-induction technique utilizing 4% sevoflurane at 8 L min−1 flow of oxygen inhaled over two minutes followed by 0.75 mg kg−1 of propofol achieved less respiratory adverse events compared with the sevoflurane group, and less hemodynamic instability compared with the propofol group.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16489144 and 1010660X
Volume :
56
Issue :
12
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Medicina
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.18cbccccc4c44726a100ccf08dd53f49
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120682