Back to Search Start Over

Prioritizing the Interview in Selecting Resident Applicants: Behavioral Interviews to Determine Goodness of Fit

Authors :
Michael B. Prystowsky MD, PhD
Evan Cadoff MD
Yungtai Lo PhD
Tiffany M. Hebert MD
Jacob J. Steinberg MD
Source :
Academic Pathology, Vol 8 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2021.

Abstract

From our initial screening of applications, we assess that the 10% to 15% of applicants whom we will interview are all academically qualified to complete our residency training program. This initial screening to select applicants to interview includes a personality assessment provided by the personal statement, Dean’s letter, and letters of recommendation that, taken together, begin our evaluation of the applicant’s cultural fit for our program. While the numerical scoring ranks applicants preinterview, the final ranking into best fit categories is determined solely on the interview day at a consensus conference by faculty and residents. We analyzed data of 819 applicants from 2005 to 2017. Most candidates were US medical graduates (62.5%) with 23.7% international medical graduates, 11.7% Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DO), and 2.1% Caribbean medical graduates. Given that personality assessment began with application review, there was excellent correlation between the preinterview composite score and the final categorical ranking in all 4 categories. For most comparisons, higher scores and categorical rankings were associated with applicants subsequently working in academia versus private practice. We found no problem in using our 3-step process employing virtual interviews during the COVID pandemic.

Subjects

Subjects :
Pathology
RB1-214

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23742895
Volume :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Academic Pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.18a73ffc105d4461a3faed9ab643e269
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/23742895211052885