Back to Search Start Over

List of non‐EU viruses and viroids of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L.

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz
Paolo Gonthier
Marie‐Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Alan MacLeod
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas‐Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans‐Hermann Thulke
Wopke Van der Werf
Antonio Vicent Civera
Jonathan Yuen
Lucia Zappalà
Thierry Candresse
Elisavet Chatzivassiliou
Stephan Winter
Michela Chiumenti
Francesco Di Serio
Tomasz Kaluski
Angelantonio Minafra
Luisa Rubino
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 17, Iss 9, Pp n/a-n/a (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Wiley, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract The Panel on Plant Health performed a listing of non‐EU viruses and viroids (reported hereinafter as viruses) of Cydonia Mill., Fragaria L., Malus Mill., Prunus L., Pyrus L., Ribes L., Rubus L. and Vitis L. A systematic literature review identified 197 viruses infecting one or more of the host genera under consideration. Viruses were allocated into three categories (i) 86 non‐EU viruses, known to occur only outside the EU or having only limited presence in the EU (i.e. reported in only one or few Member States (MSs), known to have restricted distribution, outbreaks), (ii) 97 viruses excluded at this stage from further categorisation efforts because they have significant presence in the EU (i.e. only reported so far from the EU or known to occur or be widespread in some MSs or frequently reported in the EU), (iii) 14 viruses with undetermined standing for which available information did not readily allow to allocate to one or the other of the two above groups. Comments provided by MSs during consultation phases were integrated in the opinion. The main knowledge gaps and uncertainties of this listing concern (i) the geographic distribution and prevalence of the viruses analysed, in particular when they were recently described; (ii) the taxonomy and biological status of a number of poorly characterised viruses; (iii) the host status of particular plant genera in relation to some viruses. The viruses considered as non‐EU and those with undetermined standing will be categorised in the next steps to answer a specific mandate from the Commission to develop pest categorisations for non‐EU viruses. This list does not imply a prejudice on future needs for a pest categorisation for other viruses which are excluded from the current categorisation efforts.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732 and 13480790
Volume :
17
Issue :
9
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.1744fd161d1348079063e555e6fc1cfb
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5501