Grand Design versus Multiarmed Spiral Galaxies: Dependence on Galaxy Structure

We developed an algorithm to use Galaxy Zoo 3D spiral arm masks produced by citizen scientist volunteers to semiautomatically classify spiral galaxies as either multiarmed or grand design spirals. Our final sample consists of 299 multiarmed and 245 grand design galaxies. On average, the grand design galaxies have smaller stellar masses than the multiarmed galaxies. For a given stellar mass, the grand design galaxies have larger concentrations, earlier Hubble types, smaller half-light radii, and larger central surface mass densities than the multiarmed galaxies. Lower-mass galaxies of both arm classes have later Hubble types and lower concentrations than higher-mass galaxies. In our sample, a higher fraction of grand design galaxies have classical bulges rather than pseudo-bulges, compared to multiarmed galaxies. These results are consistent with theoretical models and simulations, which suggest that dense classical bulges support the development and/or longevity of two-armed spiral patterns. Similar specific star formation rates (sSFRs) are found in multiarmed and grand design galaxies with similar stellar masses and concentrations. This implies that the sSFRs in spiral galaxies are a function of concentration and stellar mass, but independent of the number of spiral arms. Our classifications are consistent with arm counts from the Galaxy Zoo 2 project and published m = 3 Fourier amplitudes.