Back to Search Start Over

Identification and inclusion of gender factors in retrospective cohort studies: the GOING-FWD framework

Authors :
Monica Parry
Karolina Kublickiene
Valeria Raparelli
Peter Klimek
Alexandra Kautzky-Willer
Louise Pilote
Carole Clair
Michal Abrahamowicz
Jovana Stojanovic
Colleen M. Norris
Uri Bender
Maria Trinidad Herrero
Khaled El Emam
Karin H Humphries
Ruth Sapir-Pichhadze
Simon Bacon
Jennifer Fishman
Rachel P. Dryer
Christina P. Tadiri
Zahra Azizi
Rubee Dev
Pouria Alipour
Sabeena Jalal
Alexia Della Vecchia
Salima Hemani
Heather Burnside
Carola Deschinger
Juergen Harreiter
Simon D. Lindner
Teresa Gisinger
Giulia Tosti
Claudia Tucci
Giulio Francesco Romiti
Agne Laučytė-Cibulskiene
Liam Ward
Leah Muñoz
Raquel Gomez De Leon
Ana Maria Lucas
Sonia Gayoso
Raúl Nieto
Maria Sanchez
Sandra Amador
Cristina Rochel
Donna Hart
Nicole Hartman/Nickerson
Angie Fullerton/MacCaul
Jeanette Smith
Myra Lefkowitz
Ann Keir
Kyle Warkentin
Rachael Manion
Vera Regitz-Zagrosek
Londa Schiebinger
Source :
BMJ Global Health, Vol 6, Iss 4 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2021.

Abstract

Gender refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men and gender diverse people. Gender-related factors are seldom assessed as determinants of health outcomes, despite their powerful contribution. The Gender Outcomes INternational Group: to Further Well-being Development (GOING-FWD) project developed a standard five-step methodology applicable to retrospectively identify gender-related factors and assess their relationship to outcomes across selected cohorts of non-communicable chronic diseases from Austria, Canada, Spain, Sweden. Step 1 (identification of gender-related variables): Based on the gender framework of the Women Health Research Network (ie, identity, role, relations and institutionalised gender), and available literature for a certain disease, an optimal ‘wish-list’ of gender-related variables was created and discussed by experts. Step 2 (definition of outcomes): Data dictionaries were screened for clinical and patient-relevant outcomes, using the International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement framework. Step 3 (building of feasible final list): a cross-validation between variables per database and the ‘wish-list’ was performed. Step 4 (retrospective data harmonisation): The harmonisation potential of variables was evaluated. Step 5 (definition of data structure and analysis): The following analytic strategies were identified: (1) local analysis of data not transferable followed by a meta-analysis combining study-level estimates; (2) centrally performed federated analysis of data, with the individual-level participant data remaining on local servers; (3) synthesising the data locally and performing a pooled analysis on the synthetic data and (4) central analysis of pooled transferable data. The application of the GOING-FWD multistep approach can help guide investigators to analyse gender and its impact on outcomes in previously collected data.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20597908
Volume :
6
Issue :
4
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Global Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.16196f385e8a483a95d2dd98643379ec
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005413