Back to Search Start Over

Development and validation of the Evidence Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) to assess doctors’ knowledge, practice and barriers regarding the implementation of evidence-based medicine in primary care

Authors :
Ranita Hisham
Chirk Jenn Ng
Su May Liew
Pauline Siew Mei Lai
Yook Chin Chia
Ee Ming Khoo
Nik Sherina Hanafi
Sajaratulnisah Othman
Ping Yein Lee
Khatijah Lim Abdullah
Karuthan Chinna
Source :
BMC Family Practice, Vol 19, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
BMC, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) integrates best available evidence from literature and patients’ values, which then informs clinical decision making. However, there is a lack of validated instruments to assess the knowledge, practice and barriers of primary care physicians in the implementation of EBM. This study aimed to develop and validate an Evidence-Based Medicine Questionnaire (EBMQ) in Malaysia. Methods The EBMQ was developed based on a qualitative study, literature review and an expert panel. Face and content validity was verified by the expert panel and piloted among 10 participants. Primary care physicians with or without EBM training who could understand English were recruited from December 2015 to January 2016. The EBMQ was administered at baseline and two weeks later. A higher score indicates better knowledge, better practice of EBM and less barriers towards the implementation of EBM. We hypothesized that the EBMQ would have three domains: knowledge, practice and barriers. Results The final version of the EBMQ consists of 80 items: 62 items were measured on a nominal scale, 22 items were measured on a 5 point Likert-scale. Flesch reading ease was 61.2. A total of 343 participants were approached; of whom 320 agreed to participate (response rate = 93.2%). Factor analysis revealed that the EBMQ had eight domains after 13 items were removed: “EBM websites”, “evidence-based journals”, “types of studies”, “terms related to EBM”, “practice”, “access”, “patient preferences” and “support”. Cronbach alpha for the overall EBMQ was 0.909, whilst the Cronbach alpha for the individual domain ranged from 0.657–0.940. The EBMQ was able to discriminate between doctors with and without EBM training for 24 out of 42 items. At test-retest, kappa values ranged from 0.155 to 0.620. Conclusions The EBMQ was found to be a valid and reliable instrument to assess the knowledge, practice and barriers towards the implementation of EBM among primary care physicians in Malaysia.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712296
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Family Practice
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.14a44c1a316e46808f73233f17f3bea7
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0779-5