Back to Search Start Over

Geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture: an update on surgery rates and treatment consensus

Authors :
Sarah B. Floyd
Joel Campbell
Cole G. Chapman
Charles A. Thigpen
Michael J. Kissenberth
John M. Brooks
Source :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2019)
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
BMC, 2019.

Abstract

Abstract Background Using a larger, more comprehensive sample, and inclusion of the reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a primary surgical approach for proximal humerus fracture, we report on geographic variation in the treatment of proximal humerus fracture in 2011 and comment on whether treatment consensus is being reached. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of Medicare patients with an x-ray-confirmed diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture in 2011. Patients receiving reverse shoulder arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty, or open reduction internal fixation within 60 days of their diagnosis were classified as surgical management patients. Unadjusted observed surgery rates and area treatment ratios adjusted for patient demographic and clinical characteristics were calculated at the hospital referral region level. Results Among patients with proximal humerus fracture (N = 77,053), 15.4% received surgery and 84.6% received conservative management. Unadjusted surgery rates varied from 1.7 to 33.3% across hospital referral regions. Among patients receiving surgery, 22.3% received hemiarthroplasty, 65.8% received open reduction internal fixation, and 11.8% received reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Patients that were female, were younger, had fewer medical comorbidities, had a lower frailty index, were white, or were not dual-eligible for Medicaid during the month of their index fracture were more likely to receive surgery (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1749799X
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.12de09bc889c4e18839522849c981e8d
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1052-2