Back to Search Start Over

Enhancing surgical precision: unveiling the impact of preoperative colonoscopy in anal fistula patients

Authors :
Shumin Xu
Luo Zhang
Zhi Li
Kaiping Wang
Fang Liu
Bo Cao
Source :
BMC Gastroenterology, Vol 23, Iss 1, Pp 1-11 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Background Anal fistula is a common benign anorectal disease that often requires surgical intervention for effective treatment. In recent years, preoperative colonoscopy as a diagnostic tool in patients with anal fistula has garnered increasing attention due to its potential clinical application value. By investigating underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), polyps, and other abnormalities, preoperative colonoscopy can offer insights to refine surgical strategies and improve patient outcomes. Methods This retrospective study focused on 1796 patients with various benign anorectal diseases who underwent preoperative intestinal endoscopy and met surgical criteria within the preceding three years at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Among these patients, 949 diagnosed with anal fistula comprised group A, while 847 patients without anal fistula were assigned to group B for comparison. The investigation encompassed an analysis of general patient information, endoscopic findings, polyp histopathology, distribution of bowel inflammation sites, and results of inflammatory bowel disease assessments between the two patient cohorts. A subgroup analysis was also conducted on 2275 anal fistula patients with no surgical contraindications. This subgroup was categorized into Group A (949 patients who underwent preoperative intestinal endoscopy) and Group C (1326 patients who did not undergo preoperative colonoscopy). The study compared the rates of detecting endoscopic lesions and IBD-related findings between the two subgroups. Results The study initially confirmed the comparability of general patient information between groups A and B. Notably, the abnormal detection rate in group A was significantly higher than in group B (P 0.05). Subsequently, the analysis of the subgroup (groups A and C) revealed a significant disparity in intestinal endoscopic detection rates (P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471230X
Volume :
23
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Gastroenterology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.12ba03460f1e47d2bc94cea92f213e4b
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-023-03066-x