Back to Search Start Over

What Is the Accuracy of Clinical Staging for Stage III-Single-station N2 NSCLC? A Multi-Centre UK Study

Authors :
Christopher Craig, MBChB
Janet Johnston, M.B.B.S.
Patrick Goodley, MB BChir
Paul Bishop, BA, MB BCh, FRCPath
Haider Al-Najjar, MBChB, FRCP
Louise Brown, MD, MRCP
Joanna Gallagher, MBChB
Ramachandran Sundar, M.B.B.S.
Sara Upperton, MBChB
Matthew Callister, BM BCh
David Meek, BM, MRCP SCE
Laura Succony, BM
Wadood Parvez, M.B.B.S.
Muhammad Tufail, M.B.B.S., FRCP
Geeshath Jayasekera, MBChB, MRCP, PhD
John Maclay, MBChB
Alana Livesey, MB BChir
Ian Woolhouse, M.B.B.S.
Natalie Smith, BSc, MBChB
Anna Bibby, MBChB, PhD
Matthew Evison, MD, MRCP, MBChB
Source :
JTO Clinical and Research Reports, Vol 5, Iss 8, Pp 100694- (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Single-station N2 (ssN2) versus multi-station N2 has been used as a selection criterion for treatment recommendations between surgical versus non-surgical multimodality treatment in stage III-N2 NSCLC. We hypothesized that clinical staging would be susceptible to upstaging on pathologic staging and, therefore, challenge this practice. Methods: A retrospective study of prospectively collected routine clinical data for patients with stage III-N2 NSCLC that had completed computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and staging endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) and had been confirmed clinical stage III-ssN2 at multidisciplinary team discussion and went on to complete surgical resection as the first treatment to provide pathologic staging. The study was completed in two cohorts (A) across a single cancer alliance in England (Greater Manchester) January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018 and (B) across five United Kingdom centers to validate the findings in part A January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. Results: A total of 115 patients met the inclusion criteria across cohort A (56 patients) and cohort B (59 patients) across 15 United Kingdom hospitals. The proportion of cases in which clinical stage III-ssN2 was upstaged to pathologic stage III-multi-station N2 was 34% (19 of 56) in cohort A, 32% in cohort B (19 of 59), and 33% across the combined study cohort (38 of 115). Most patients had a single radiologically abnormal lymph node on CT and PET (88%, 105 of 115). In the majority, the reasons for missed N2 disease on staging EBUS were due to inaccessible (stations 5, 6, 8, 9) N2 nodes at EBUS (34%, 13 of 38) and accessible lymph nodes not sampled during staging EBUS as not meeting sampling threshold (40%, 15 of 38) rather than false-negative sampling during EBUS (26%, 10 of 38). Conclusions: During multidisciplinary team discussions, clinicians must be aware that one-third of patients with stage III-ssN2 on the basis of CT, PET, and staging EBUS do not truly have ssN2 and this questions the use of this criterion to define treatment recommendations.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26663643
Volume :
5
Issue :
8
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
JTO Clinical and Research Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.11bc8eb79e6f403d9c64c4624170c6da
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100694