Back to Search Start Over

Abstract 153: Pre‐procedural 3D visualization of deep‐learning vascular segmentation enhances identification of difficult femoral access in thrombectomy

Authors :
Pere Canals
Manuel Requena
Álvaro García‐Tornel
Marc Molina
Alejandro Tomasello
Jiahui Li
Simone Balocco
Oliver Díaz
Marc Ribó
Source :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology, Vol 3, Iss S2 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Wiley, 2023.

Abstract

Introduction Difficult or impossible femoral access remains a significant burden for mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke, affecting between 4.4% (impossible) to ∼10% of cases (time to first angiography [T1A] > 30 min) [1]. Visualization of CT angiography (CTA) or MR angiography are the only available diagnostic tools for neurointerventionalists (NIs) to qualitatively assess catheterization difficulty ahead of intervention. Visualization of 3D segmentation of the head‐and‐neck arteries from CTA may provide enhanced spatial information for catheter access difficulty assessment to the occlusion site, as well as large vessel occlusion (LVO) localization or carotid stenosis detection. Methods Three observers (2 expert NIs and 1 medical image engineer) assessed a sample of patients with anterior circulation stroke rating LVO location, femoral access difficulty according to a Likert scale (0 to 5) and assessment of radial access compared to femoral (easier or not). Raters were asked to answer the same form for each case twice, once after visualizing only the CTA and again after visualizing a deep‐learning, automated 3D segmentation of the head‐and‐neck arteries from CTA [2]. Cases were randomly sampled and blind to raters for both assessments. Likert scale values were normalized and averaged across observers, and correlation to T1A was studied. LVO localization accuracy and time needed for the analysis was also assessed. Results The final sample included N = 117 cases, where 22.98% presented difficult or impossible access. LVO location prevalence was 13/15/45/27% for extracranial ICA (eICA)/TICA/M1/M2, and 49/51% for right/left. Averaged Likert values presented significant linear correlation for both segmentation and CTA visualization, but this was much stronger in the former (R: 0.58 vs 0.30, p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26945746
Volume :
3
Issue :
S2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.111bb9ad0e2d4d40867cb384c2f6770d
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/SVIN.03.suppl_2.153