Aerodynamic Optimization of Transonic Rotor Using Radial Basis Function Based Deformation and Data-Driven Differential Evolution Optimizer

The complicated flow conditions and massive design parameters bring two main difficulties to the aerodynamic optimization of axial compressors: expensive evaluations and numerous optimization variables. To address these challenges, this paper establishes a novel fast aerodynamic optimization platform for axial compressors, consisting of a radial basic function (RBF)-based blade parameterization method, a data-driven differential evolution optimizer, and a computational fluid dynamic (CFD) solver. As a versatile interpolation method, RBF is used as the shape parameterization and deformation technique to reduce optimization variables. Aiming to acquire competitive solutions in limited steps, a data-driven evolution optimizer is developed, named the pre-screen surrogate model assistant differential evolution (pre-SADE) optimizer. Different from most surrogate model-assisted evolutionary algorithms, surrogate models in pre-SADE are used to screen the samples, rather than directly estimate them, in each generation to reduce expensive evaluations. The polynomial regression model, Kriging model, and RBF model are integrated in the surrogate model to improve the accuracy. To further save optimization time, the optimizer also integrates parallel task management programs. The aerodynamic optimization of a transonic rotor (NASA Rotor 37) is performed as the validation of the platform. A differential evolution (DE) optimizer and another surrogate model-assisted algorithm, committee-based active learning for surrogate model assisted particle swarm optimization (CAL-SAPSO), are introduced for the comparison runs. After optimization, the adiabatic efficiency, total pressure ratio, and surge margin are, respectively, increased by 1.47%, 1.0%, and 0.79% compared to the initial rotor. In the same limited steps, pre-SADE gets a 0.57% and 0.51% higher rotor adiabatic efficiency than DE and CAL-SAPSO, respectively. With the help of parallel techniques, pre-SADE and DE save half the optimization time compared to CAL-SAPSO. The results verify the effectiveness and the rapidity of the fast aerodynamic optimization platform.