Back to Search Start Over

The comparison of effectiveness of acupressure on Spleen 6 and Hugo points on the severity of postpartum pain: A randomized clinical trial

Authors :
Saba Mohamadghasem‐Nejad Maleki
Sousan Heydarpour
Rojin Nikrai
Fateme Heydarpour
Source :
Health Science Reports, Vol 7, Iss 7, Pp n/a-n/a (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
Wiley, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background and aims Postpartum pain poses a significant challenge for new mothers. Various nonpharmacological methods are employed to manage postpartum pain. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of acupressure on Spleen 6 and Hugo points on the severity of postpartum pain. Methods In this parallel randomized trial study, 68 eligible primiparous women who had vaginal deliveries and experienced postpartum pain at Farabi Hospital in Malekan (a city in East Azarbaijan Province in Iran) were selected according to inclusion/exclusion criteria and then allocated to the Hugo (n = 34) and Spleen 6 (n = 34) acupressure groups using a randomized block design (six blocks). The data collection process took place from November 2022 to April 2023. The participants were blinded; however, the analysts and investigators were not blinded. Acupressure interventions were applied bilaterally for 20 min, consisting of 10 s of pressure followed by 2 s of rest. Pain intensity was assessed using a visual pain scale before, immediately after, and 1 h after the intervention. In total, 68 participants fulfilled the study. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 25 with chi‐square, Mann–Whitney, and Friedman tests. Results Both groups exhibited a statistically significant reduction in postpartum pain intensity across all periods (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
23988835
Volume :
7
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Health Science Reports
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0f030aba56434d35a56c009a1b54af56
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.2265