Back to Search Start Over

Quality of life analyses in patients with multiple myeloma: results from the Selinexor (KPT-330) Treatment of Refractory Myeloma (STORM) phase 2b study

Authors :
Gabriel Tremblay
Patrick Daniele
Janis Breeze
Lingling Li
Jatin Shah
Sharon Shacham
Michael Kauffman
Monika Engelhardt
Ajaj Chari
Ajay Nooka
Dan Vogl
Maria Gavriatopoulou
Meletios-Athanasios Dimopoulos
Paul Richardson
Noa Biran
David Siegel
Philip Vlummens
Chantal Doyen
Thierry Facon
Mohamad Mohty
Nathalie Meuleman
Moshe Levy
Luciano Costa
James E. Hoffman
Michel Delforge
David Kaminetzky
Katja Weisel
Marc Raab
David Dingli
Sascha Tuchman
Frenzel Laurent
Ravi Vij
Gary Schiller
Philippe Moreau
Joshua Richter
Martin Schreder
Klaus Podar
Terri Parker
Robert Frank Cornell
Karlin Lionel
Sylvain Choquet
Jagannath Sundar
Source :
BMC Cancer, Vol 21, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
BMC, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Background Selinexor is an oral, selective nuclear export inhibitor. STORM was a phase 2b, single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial of selinexor with low dose dexamethasone in patients with penta-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) that met its primary endpoint, with overall response of 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19 to 35%). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was a secondary endpoint measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM). This study examines impact of selinexor treatment on HRQoL of patients treated in STORM and reports two approaches to calculate minimal clinically important differences for the FACT-MM. Methods FACT-MM data were collected at baseline, on day 1 of each 4-week treatment cycle, and at end of treatment (EOT). Changes from baseline were analyzed for the FACT-MM total score, FACT-trial outcome index (TOI), FACT-General (FACT-G), and the MM-specific domain using mixed-effects regression models. Two approaches for evaluating minimal clinically important differences were explored: the first defined as 10% of the instrument range, and the second based on estimated mean baseline differences between Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) scores. Post-hoc difference analysis compared change in scores from baseline to EOT for treatment responders and non-responders. Results Eighty patients were included in the analysis; the mean number of prior therapies was 7.9 (standard deviation [SD] 3.1), and mean duration of myeloma was 7.6 years (SD 3.4). Each exploratory minimal clinically important difference threshold yielded consistent results whereby most patients did not experience HRQoL decline during the first six cycles of treatment (range: 53.9 to 75.7% for the first approach; range: 52.6 to 72.9% for the second). Treatment responders experienced less decline in HRQoL from baseline to EOT than non-responders, which was significant for the FACT-G, but not for other scores. Conclusion The majority of patients did not experience decline in HRQoL based on minimal clinically important differences during early cycles of treatment with selinexor and dexamethasone in the STORM trial. An anchor-based approach utilizing patient-level data (ECOG PS score) to define minimal clinically important differences for the FACT-MM gave consistent results with a distribution-based approach. Trial registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov under the trial-ID NCT02336815 on January 8, 2015.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712407
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMC Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0d07b841e64c82afc2fcdee19751cf
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08453-9