Back to Search Start Over

GRB 240529A: A Tale of Two Shocks

Authors :
Tian-Rui Sun
Jin-Jun Geng
Jing-Zhi Yan
You-Dong Hu
Xue-Feng Wu
Alberto J. Castro-Tirado
Chao Yang
Yi-Ding Ping
Chen-Ran Hu
Fan Xu
Hao-Xuan Gao
Ji-An Jiang
Yan-Tian Zhu
Yongquan Xue
Ignacio Pérez-García
Si-Yu Wu
Emilio Fernández-García
María D. Caballero-García
Rubén Sánchez-Ramírez
Sergiy Guziy
I. Olivares
Carlos Jesus Pérez del Pulgar
A. Castellón
S. Castillo
Ding-Rong Xiong
Shashi B. Pandey
David Hiriart
Guillermo García-Segura
William H. Lee
I. M. Carrasco-García
Il H. Park
S. Jeong
Petrus J. Meintjes
Hendrik J. van Heerden
Antonio Martín-Carrillo
Lorraine Hanlon
Bin-Bin Zhang
L. Hernández-García
Maria Gritsevich
Andrea Rossi
Elisabetta Maiorano
Felice Cusano
Paolo D’Avanzo
Matteo Ferro
Andrea Melandri
Massimiliano De Pasquale
Riccardo Brivio
Min Fang
Lu-Lu Fan
Wei-Da Hu
Zhen Wan
Lei Hu
Ying-Xi Zuo
Jin-Long Tang
Xiao-Ling Zhang
Xian-Zhong Zheng
Bin Li
Wen-Tao Luo
Wei Liu
Jian Wang
Hong-Fei Zhang
Hao Liu
Jie Gao
Ming Liang
Hai-Ren Wang
Da-Zhi Yao
Jing-Quan Cheng
Wen Zhao
Zi-Gao Dai
Source :
The Astrophysical Journal Letters, Vol 976, Iss 2, p L20 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2024.

Abstract

Thanks to the rapidly increasing time-domain facilities, we are entering a golden era of research on gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). In this Letter, we report our observations of GRB 240529A with the Burst Optical Observer and Transient Exploring System, the 1.5 m telescope at Observatorio de Sierra Nevada, the 2.5 m Wide Field Survey Telescope of China, the Large Binocular Telescope, and the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo. The prompt emission of GRB 240529A shows two comparable energetic episodes separated by a quiescence time of roughly 400 s. Combining all available data on the GRB Coordinates Network, we reveal the simultaneous apparent X-ray plateau and optical rebrightening around 10 ^3 –10 ^4 s after the burst. Rather than the energy injection from the magnetar as widely invoked for similar GRBs, the multiwavelength emissions could be better explained as two shocks launched from the central engine separately. The optical peak time and our numerical modeling suggest that the initial bulk Lorentz factor of the later shock is roughly 50, which indicates that the later jet should be accretion driven and have a higher mass loading than a typical one. The quiescence time between the two prompt emission episodes may be caused by the transition between different accretion states of a central magnetar or black hole, or the fallback accretion process. A sample of similar bursts with multiple emission episodes in the prompt phase and sufficient follow-up could help to probe the underlying physics of GRB central engines.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20418213 and 20418205
Volume :
976
Issue :
2
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Astrophysical Journal Letters
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0c933a0409394e7e90e98575e4ce954e
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad85da