Back to Search Start Over

Connectivity guided theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant moderate to severe depression: study protocol for a randomised double-blind controlled trial (BRIGhTMIND)

Authors :
Cassandra Brookes
Shaun Barber
Mark Liddle
Neil Nixon
Peter Bates
Richard Morriss
Marilyn James
Ana Suazo Di Paola
Paul M Briley
Louise Thomson
Lucy Webster
Mohamed Abdelghani
Dorothee P Auer
Andrew Blamire
Sarina Iwabuchi
Catherine Kaylor-Hughes
Sudheer Lankappa
Peter Liddle
Hamish McAllister-Williams
Alex O'Neill-Kerr
Stefan Pszczolkowski Parraguez
Yvette Walters
Lorraine Bastick
Rosie Carr
Alison Cartlidge
Harry Clark
William Cottam
Robert De Vai
Linda Davison
John Gledhill
Adele Gregory
Christopher Griffiths
Andrew Hamilton
Delilah Harding
Kelly Heath
Rachel Hobson
Gbeminiyi Ireoluwa
Najat Khalifa
Kate Johnstone
Charlotte Kirkland
Jessica Lynch
Jehill Parikh
Isabel Reid
Noemi Reiner
Sandra Simpson
Beverley Smith
Tina Sore
Joseph Stone
Carly Taylorson
Rebecca Toney
Claire Turner
Sarah Wilkinson
Andy Willis
Tom Willis
Source :
BMJ Open, Vol 10, Iss 7 (2020)
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group, 2020.

Abstract

Introduction The BRIGhTMIND study aims to determine the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and mechanism of action of connectivity guided intermittent theta burst stimulation (cgiTBS) versus standard repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in adults with moderate to severe treatment resistant depression.Methods and analysis The study is a randomised double-blind controlled trial with 1:1 allocation to either 20 sessions of (1) cgiTBS or (2) neuronavigated rTMS not using connectivity guidance. A total of 368 eligible participants with a diagnosis of current unipolar major depressive disorder that is both treatment resistant (defined as scoring 2 or more on the Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Score) and moderate to severe (scoring >16 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17)), will be recruited from primary and secondary care settings at four treatment centres in the UK. The primary outcome is depression response at 16 weeks (50% or greater reduction in HDRS-17 score from baseline). Secondary outcomes include assessments of self-rated depression, anxiety, psychosocial functioning, cognition and quality of life at 8, 16 and 26 weeks postrandomisation. Cost-effectiveness, patient acceptability, safety, mechanism of action and predictors of response will also be examined.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval was granted by East Midlands Leicester Central Research Ethics Committee (ref: 18/EM/0232) on 30 August 2018. The results of the study will be published in relevant peer-reviewed journals, and then through professional and public conferences and media. Further publications will explore patient experience, moderators and mediators of outcome and mechanism of action.Trial registration number ISRCTN19674644

Subjects

Subjects :
Medicine

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20446055
Volume :
10
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
BMJ Open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0c34f647bd824f3a87a7b670496e159f
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038430