Back to Search Start Over

Mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Authors :
Karim Asehnoune
Paul Rooze
Chiara Robba
Marwan Bouras
Luciana Mascia
Raphaël Cinotti
Paolo Pelosi
Antoine Roquilly
Source :
Critical Care, Vol 27, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
BMC, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Objective To describe the potential effects of ventilatory strategies on the outcome of acute brain-injured patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation. Design Systematic review with an individual data meta-analysis. Setting Observational and interventional (before/after) studies published up to August 22nd, 2022, were considered for inclusion. We investigated the effects of low tidal volume Vt = 8 ml/Kg of IBW, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) = 5 cmH2O and protective ventilation (association of both) on relevant clinical outcomes. Population Patients with acute brain injury (trauma or haemorrhagic stroke) with invasive mechanical ventilation for ≥ 24 h. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was mortality at 28 days or in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the duration of mechanical ventilation and the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio. Results The meta-analysis included eight studies with a total of 5639 patients. There was no difference in mortality between low and high tidal volume [Odds Ratio, OR 0.88 (95%Confidence Interval, CI 0.74 to 1.05), p = 0.16, I 2 = 20%], low and moderate to high PEEP [OR 0.8 (95% CI 0.59 to 1.07), p = 0.13, I 2 = 80%] or protective and non-protective ventilation [OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93 to 1.15), p = 0.6, I 2 = 11]. Low tidal volume [OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.45 to 1.21, p = 0.23, I 2 = 88%], moderate PEEP [OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.26), p = 0.9, I 2 = 21%] or protective ventilation [OR 1.22 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.58), p = 0.13, I 2 = 22%] did not affect the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Protective ventilation improved the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the first five days of mechanical ventilation (p

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
27
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0bf66d3516f5440f87be205ad8ce1103
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04509-3