Back to Search Start Over

Scientific opinion on the import of Musa fruits as a pathway for the entry of non‐EU Tephritidae into the EU territory

Authors :
EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH)
Claude Bragard
Katharina Dehnen‐Schmutz
Francesco Di Serio
Paolo Gonthier
Marie‐Agnès Jacques
Josep Anton Jaques Miret
Annemarie Fejer Justesen
Alan MacLeod
Christer Sven Magnusson
Panagiotis Milonas
Juan A Navas‐Cortes
Stephen Parnell
Roel Potting
Philippe Lucien Reignault
Hans‐Hermann Thulke
Antonio Vicent Civera
Jonathan Yuen
Lucia Zappalà
Nikolaos Papadopoulos
Stella Papanastasiou
Ewelina Czwienczek
Virág Kertész
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 19, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Plant Health examined evidence as to whether the import of fruits of Musa (bananas and plantains) could provide a pathway into the EU for Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) or other non‐EU Tephritidae for which Musa is a host. Relevant scientific and technical information, including unpublished information provided to the EFSA Panel on Plant Health by the European Commission from research conducted in Cabo Verde, were taken into account. The majority of EU imports of Musa fruit comes from Ecuador, Colombia and Costa Rica where B. dorsalis does not occur. Commercial Musa fruits are harvested at ‘green stage one’ before they begin to ripen naturally. Postharvest processes are designed to ensure that only high quality, unripe fruit are exported. Green stage one fruit are transported to the EU in controlled conditions and stimulated to ripen when exposed to exogenous ethylene in ripening rooms in the EU. There is no evidence that any Tephritidae can naturally infest commercial varieties of Musa fruit at green stage one or earlier. When experimentally infested with eggs of Tephritidae, larvae fail to develop in green stage one fruit. Physical and chemical changes that occur during fruit ripening enable B. dorsalis and 11 other species of Tephritidae to oviposit and develop in Musa at later stages of fruit development. Reports of B. dorsalis or other Tephritidae infesting bunches of Musa fruit are a consequence of the fruit being left to develop beyond green stage one in the field. There is no evidence that commercially grown fruits of Musa, for export to the EU, provide a pathway for the entry of non‐EU Tephritidae. Passengers bringing Musa fruit from countries where Tephritidae can infest ripened Musa fruit do however provide a potential pathway for the entry of non‐EU Tephritidae into the EU territory.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
19
Issue :
3
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0b9e5ec9991f4ef8a14dcaad34da4035
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6426