Back to Search Start Over

Techno‐economic analysis and energy performance of a geothermal earth‐to‐air heat exchanger (EAHE) system in residential buildings: A case study

Authors :
Ali Mostafaeipour
Hossein Goudarzi
Mohammadali Khanmohammadi
Mehdi Jahangiri
Ahmad Sedaghat
Hirbod Norouzianpour
Shahariar Chowdhury
Kuaanan Techato
Alibek Issakhov
Khalid Almutairi
Seyyed Jalaladdin Hosseini Dehshiri
Source :
Energy Science & Engineering, Vol 9, Iss 10, Pp 1807-1825 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Natural air ventilation in the hot‐dry regions plays a key role to decrease indoor air temperature in hot season, also to improve thermal comfort during the cold season. One of the most common ways to take advantage of natural ventilation is using wind catcher with an underground tunnel. In this method, the tower catches the airflow and directs it to the underground tunnel to decrease the air temperature by transferring heat to the ground, which is cooler in the summer and warmer in the winter. Earth‐to‐air heat exchanger (EAHE) is a modern form of wind catcher with underground tunnel. In this method, air after passing through buried pipes exchanges heat with the ground, and its temperature increases in the winter and decreases during the summer. This study analyzes the energy performance and cost‐effectiveness of earth‐to‐air heat exchanger to be utilized in a residential building in climate condition of the province of Kermanin Iran. In this regard, 9 different configurations of the EAHE are investigated to find the optimized EAHE. The system performance and cost‐effectiveness are studied in 3 different depths including 1, 2, and 3 m with 3 different pipe lengths including 25, 50, and 75 m. The results show that the EAHE is capable of reducing the inlet air temperature by 0.5‐9.9℃ in the summer and increasing it by 0.9‐11.2℃ in the winter. Furthermore, by integrating the EAHEs in a building design, one can reduce the total annual cooling load by 1.25%‐3.97% and for heating by 1.34%‐3.96%. The payback period of the system with a pipe length of 25 m is 16 years, but for the systems with pipe lengths of 50 and 75 m, this period reduces to almost 3 years.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20500505
Volume :
9
Issue :
10
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Energy Science & Engineering
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0b98a67693c84816be0142b8daca3150
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.952