Back to Search Start Over

Academic global surgical competencies: A modified Delphi consensus study.

Authors :
Natalie Pawlak
Christine Dart
Hernan Sacoto Aguilar
Emmanuel Ameh
Abebe Bekele
Maria F Jimenez
Kokila Lakhoo
Doruk Ozgediz
Nobhojit Roy
Girma Terfera
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
Barnabas Tobi Alayande
Nivaldo Alonso
Geoffrey A Anderson
Stanley N C Anyanwu
Alazar Berhe Aregawi
Soham Bandyopadhyay
Tahmina Banu
Alemayehu Ginbo Bedada
Anteneh Gadisa Belachew
Fabio Botelho
Emmanuel Bua
Leticia Nunes Campos
Chris Dodgion
Michalina Drejza
Marcel E Durieux
Rohini Dutta
Sarnai Erdene
Rodrigo Vaz Ferreira
Zipporah Gathuya
Dhruva Ghosh
Randeep Singh Jawa
Walter D Johnson
Fauzia Anis Khan
Fanny Jamileth Navas Leon
Kristin L Long
Jana B. A. Macleod
Anshul Mahajan
Rebecca G Maine
Grace Zurielle C Malolos
Craig D McClain
Mary T Nabukenya
Peter M Nthumba
Benedict C Nwomeh
Daniel Kinyuru Ojuka
Norgrove Penny
Martha A Quiodettis
Jennifer Rickard
Lina Roa
Lucas Sousa Salgado
Lubna Samad
Justina Onyioza Seyi-Olajide
Martin Smith
Nichole Starr
Richard J Stewart
John L Tarpley
Julio L Trostchansky
Ivan Trostchansky
Thomas G Weiser
Adili Wobenjo
Elliot Wollner
Sudha Jayaraman
Source :
PLOS Global Public Health, Vol 3, Iss 7, p e0002102 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2023.

Abstract

Academic global surgery is a rapidly growing field that aims to improve access to safe surgical care worldwide. However, no universally accepted competencies exist to inform this developing field. A consensus-based approach, with input from a diverse group of experts, is needed to identify essential competencies that will lead to standardization in this field. A task force was set up using snowball sampling to recruit a broad group of content and context experts in global surgical and perioperative care. A draft set of competencies was revised through the modified Delphi process with two rounds of anonymous input. A threshold of 80% consensus was used to determine whether a competency or sub-competency learning objective was relevant to the skillset needed within academic global surgery and perioperative care. A diverse task force recruited experts from 22 countries to participate in both rounds of the Delphi process. Of the n = 59 respondents completing both rounds of iterative polling, 63% were from low- or middle-income countries. After two rounds of anonymous feedback, participants reached consensus on nine core competencies and 31 sub-competency objectives. The greatest consensus pertained to competency in ethics and professionalism in global surgery (100%) with emphasis on justice, equity, and decolonization across multiple competencies. This Delphi process, with input from experts worldwide, identified nine competencies which can be used to develop standardized academic global surgery and perioperative care curricula worldwide. Further work needs to be done to validate these competencies and establish assessments to ensure that they are taught effectively.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27673375
Volume :
3
Issue :
7
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
PLOS Global Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.09cbec867214bf5b1aeca3ce1321819
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002102