Pulsatile pulmonary artery pressure in a large animal model of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Similarities and differences with human data

Abstract A striking feature of the human pulmonary circulation is that mean (mPAP) and systolic (sPAP) pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs) are strongly related and, thus, are essentially redundant. According to the empirical formula documented under normotensive and hypertensive conditions (mPAP = 0.61 sPAP + 2 mmHg), sPAP matches ~160%mPAP on average. This attests to the high pulsatility of PAP, as also witnessed by the near equality of PA pulse pressure and mPAP. Our prospective study tested if pressure redundancy and high pulsatility also apply in a piglet model of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). At baseline (Week‐0, W0), Sham (n = 8) and CTEPH (n = 27) had similar mPAP and stroke volume. At W6, mPAP increased in CTEPH only, with a two‐ to three‐fold increase in PA stiffness and total pulmonary resistance. Seven CTEPH piglets were also studied at W16 at baseline, after volume loading, and after acute pulmonary embolism associated with dobutamine infusion. There was a strong linear relationship between sPAP and mPAP (1) at W0 and W6 (n = 70 data points, r² = 0.95); (2) in the subgroup studied at W16 (n = 21, r² = 0.97); and (3) when all data were pooled (n = 91, r² = 0.97, sPAP range 9–112 mmHg). The PA pulsatility was lower than that expected based on observations in humans: sPAP matched ~120%mPAP only and PA pulse pressure was markedly lower than mPAP. In conclusion, the redundancy between mPAP and sPAP seems a characteristic of the pulmonary circulation independent of the species. However, it is suggested that the sPAP thresholds used to define PH in animals are species‐ and/or model‐dependent and thus must be validated.