Back to Search Start Over

A CHIME/FRB Study of Burst Rate and Morphological Evolution of the Periodically Repeating FRB 20180916B

Authors :
Ketan R. Sand
Daniela Breitman
Daniele Michilli
Victoria M. Kaspi
Pragya Chawla
Emmanuel Fonseca
Ryan Mckinven
Kenzie Nimmo
Ziggy Pleunis
Kaitlyn Shin
Bridget C. Andersen
Mohit Bhardwaj
P. J. Boyle
Charanjot Brar
Tomas Cassanelli
Amanda M. Cook
Alice P. Curtin
Fengqiu Adam Dong
Gwendolyn M. Eadie
B. M. Gaensler
Jane Kaczmarek
Adam Lanman
Calvin Leung
Kiyoshi W. Masui
Mubdi Rahman
Ayush Pandhi
Aaron B. Pearlman
Emily Petroff
Masoud Rafiei-Ravandi
Paul Scholz
Vishwangi Shah
Kendrick Smith
Ingrid Stairs
David C. Stenning
Source :
The Astrophysical Journal, Vol 956, Iss 1, p 23 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
IOP Publishing, 2023.

Abstract

FRB 20180916B is a repeating fast radio burst (FRB) with a 16.3 day periodicity in its activity. In this study, we present morphological properties of 60 FRB 20180916B bursts detected by CHIME/FRB between 2018 August and 2021 December. We recorded raw voltage data for 45 of these bursts, enabling microseconds time resolution in some cases. We studied variation of spectro-temporal properties with time and activity phase. We find that the variation in dispersion measure (DM) is ≲1 pc cm ^−3 and that there is burst-to-burst variation in scattering time estimates ranging from ∼0.16 to over 2 ms, with no discernible trend with activity phase for either property. Furthermore, we find no DM and scattering variability corresponding to the recent change in rotation measure from the source, which has implications for the immediate environment of the source. We find that FRB 20180916B has thus far shown no epochs of heightened activity as have been seen in other active repeaters by CHIME/FRB, with its burst count consistent with originating from a Poissonian process. We also observe no change in the value of the activity period over the duration of our observations and set a 1 σ upper limit of 1.5 × 10 ^−4 day day ^−1 on the absolute period derivative. Finally, we discuss constraints on progenitor models yielded by our results, noting that our upper limits on changes in scattering and DM as a function of phase do not support models invoking a massive binary companion star as the origin of the 16.3 day periodicity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15384357
Volume :
956
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
The Astrophysical Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.07cecdf92a4fd387304d6a50369c24
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acf221