Back to Search Start Over

Ciprofol as compared to propofol for sedation and general anesthesia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Authors :
Jessica M. Currò
Cristina Santonocito
Federica Merola
Simone Messina
Marco Sanfilippo
Serena Brancati
Filippo Drago
Filippo Sanfilippo
Source :
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care, Vol 4, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2024)
Publication Year :
2024
Publisher :
BMC, 2024.

Abstract

Abstract Background Propofol is the most commonly used hypnotic agent used during sedation and general anesthesia (GA) practice, offering faster recovery compared to benzodiazepines. However, cardiovascular impact of propofol and pain at injection are commonly encountered side effects. Ciprofol is a novel disubstituted phenol derivative, and there is growing evidence regarding its clinical use. Methods We conducted a systematic literature search (updated on 23 July 2023) to evaluate safety and efficacy of ciprofol in comparison to propofol in patients undergoing procedures under sedation or GA. We focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, extrapolating data on onset and offset, and on the side effects and the pain at injection. Results The search revealed 14 RCTs, all conducted in China. Eight RCTs studied patients undergoing sedation, and six focused on GA. Bolus of ciprofol for sedation or induction of GA varied from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg. In four studies using ciprofol for maintenance of GA, it was 0.8–2.4 mg/kg/h. Ciprofol pharmacokinetics seemed characterized by slower onset and offset as compared to propofol. Pain during injection was less frequent in the ciprofol group in all the 13 studies reporting it. Eight studies reported “adverse events” as a pooled outcome, and in five cases, the incidence was higher in the propofol group, not different in the remaining ones. Occurrence of hypotension was the most commonly investigated side effects, and it seemed less frequent with ciprofol. Conclusion Ciprofol for sedation or GA may be safer than propofol, though its pharmacokinetics may be less advantageous. Graphical Abstract

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
27313786
Volume :
4
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Journal of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0536699804c43d8bcab09ba4a402d92
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44158-024-00159-1