Back to Search Start Over

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)

Authors :
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Maria Arena
Domenica Auteri
Stefania Barmaz
Alba Brancato
Daniela Brocca
Laszlo Bura
Luis Carrasco Cabrera
Arianna Chiusolo
Consuelo Civitella
Daniele Court Marques
Federica Crivellente
Lucie Ctverackova
Chloe De Lentdecker
Mark Egsmose
Zoltan Erdos
Gabriella Fait
Lucien Ferreira
Luna Greco
Alessio Ippolito
Frederique Istace
Samira Jarrah
Dimitra Kardassi
Renata Leuschner
Alfonso Lostia
Christopher Lythgo
Jose Oriol Magrans
Paula Medina
Desire Mineo
Ileana Miron
Tunde Molnar
Laura Padovani
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Ragnor Pedersen
Hermine Reich
Angela Sacchi
Miguel Santos
Rositsa Serafimova
Rachel Sharp
Alois Stanek
Franz Streissl
Juergen Sturma
Csaba Szentes
Jose Tarazona
Andrea Terron
Anne Theobald
Benedicte Vagenende
Joanke Van Dijk
Laura Villamar‐Bouza
Source :
EFSA Journal, Vol 16, Iss 11, Pp n/a-n/a (2018)
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Wiley, 2018.

Abstract

Abstract The conclusions of EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Greece and co‐rapporteur Member State Germany for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of clodinafop‐propargyl as a herbicide on wheat, rye and triticale. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
16
Issue :
11
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.04d154a72b694a94987f8a90b943c9b8
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5467