Back to Search Start Over

A randomized, double‐blind, phase II study of oral histone deacetylase inhibitor resminostat plus S‐1 versus placebo plus S‐1 in biliary tract cancers previously treated with gemcitabine plus platinum‐based chemotherapy

Authors :
Makoto Ueno
Chigusa Morizane
Masayuki Furukawa
Daisuke Sakai
Yoshito Komatsu
Yousuke Nakai
Masahiro Tsuda
Masato Ozaka
Nobumasa Mizuno
Manabu Muto
Akira Fukutomi
Masafumi Ikeda
Akihito Tsuji
Akio Katanuma
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Takeshi Kajiwara
Hiroshi Ishii
Yuji Negoro
Satoshi Shimizu
Noriko Nemoto
Shingo Kobayashi
Keigo Makino
Junji Furuse
Source :
Cancer Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 6, Pp 2088-2099 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Effective second‐line chemotherapy options are limited in treating advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs). Resminostat is an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor. Such inhibitors increase sensitivity to fluorouracil, the active form of S‐1. In the phase I study, addition of resminostat to S‐1 was suggested to have promising efficacy for pre‐treated BTCs. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of resminostat plus S‐1 in second‐line therapy for BTCs. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive resminostat or placebo (200 mg orally per day; days 1–5 and 8–12) and S‐1 group (80–120 mg orally per day by body surface area; days 1–14) over a 21‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints comprised overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. Results Among 101 patients enrolled, 50 received resminostat+S‐1 and 51 received placebo+S‐1. Median PFS was 2.9 months for resminostat+S‐1 vs. 3.0 months for placebo+S‐1 (HR: 1.154, 95% CI: 0.759–1.757, p = 0.502); median OS was 7.8 months vs. 7.5 months, respectively (HR: 1.049, 95% CI: 0.653–1.684, p = 0.834); the RR and DCR were 6.0% vs. 9.8% and 70.0% vs. 78.4%, respectively. Treatment‐related adverse events (TrAEs) of grade ≥ 3 occurring more frequently (≥10% difference) in the resminostat+S‐1 than in the placebo+S‐1 comprised platelet count decreased (18.0% vs. 2.0%) and decreased appetite (16.0% vs. 2.0%). Conclusions Resminostat plus S‐1 therapy improved neither PFS nor OS for patients with pre‐treated BTCs. Addition of resminostat to S‐1 was associated with higher incidence of TrAEs, but these were manageable (JapicCTI‐183883).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Volume :
10
Issue :
6
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Cancer Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.0445e9649c546018114eb63c08c8a74
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3813