Back to Search Start Over

Remote Digital Monitoring for Medical Product Development

Authors :
Elena S. Izmailova
John A. Wagner
Nadir Ammour
Ninad Amondikar
Andrea Bell‐Vlasov
Steven Berman
Dan Bloomfield
Linda S. Brady
Xuemei Cai
Roberto A. Calle
Michelle Campbell
Francesca Cerreta
Ieuan Clay
Luca Foschini
Pat Furlong
Rob Goldel
Jennifer S. Goldsack
Peter M.A. Groenen
Amos Folarin
Jill Heemskerk
Peter Honig
Matthew Hotopf
Tania Kamphaus
Daniel R. Karlin
Christopher Leptak
Qi Liu
Husseini Manji
Robert J. Mather
Joseph P. Menetski
Vaibhav A. Narayan
Elektra Papadopoulos
Bakul Patel
Bray Patrick‐Lake
Jagdeep T. Podichetty
Abhishek Pratap
Laurent Servais
Diane Stephenson
Pam Tenaerts
Bruce J. Tromberg
Steve Usdin
Srikanth Vasudevan
Vadim Zipunnikov
Steven C. Hoffmann
Source :
Clinical and Translational Science, Vol 14, Iss 1, Pp 94-101 (2021)
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

The use of digital health products has gained considerable interest as a new way to improve therapeutic research and development. Although these products are being adopted by various industries and stakeholders, their incorporation in clinical trials has been slow due to a disconnect between the promises of digital products and potential risks in using these new technologies in the absence of regulatory support. The Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium hosted a public workshop to address challenges and opportunities in this field. Important characteristics of tool development were addressed in a series of presentations, case studies, and open panel sessions. The workshop participants endorsed the usefulness of an evidentiary criteria framework, highlighted the importance of early patient engagement, and emphasized the potential impact of digital monitoring tools and precompetitive collaborations. Concerns were expressed about the lack of real‐life validation examples and the limitations of legacy standards used as a benchmark for novel tool development and validation. Participants recognized the need for novel analytical and statistical approaches to accommodate analyses of these novel data types. Future directions are to harmonize definitions to build common methodologies and foster multidisciplinary collaborations; to develop approaches toward integrating digital monitoring data with the totality of the data in clinical trials, and to continue an open dialog in the community. There was a consensus that all these efforts combined may create a paradigm shift of how clinical trials are planned, conducted, and results brought to regulatory reviews.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17528062 and 17528054
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Clinical and Translational Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.036413a7e3c24b77b02be80c333983be
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12851